Should the sanctioning organizations order a rematch of Kovalev-Ward?
Collapse
-
-
That's a terrible insult - I was very opposed to the Iraq War and I'm opposed the current western involvement in Syria.
I'm a paleo-conservative and libertarian.Comment
-
Just came on here to say exactly this. I have no idea which way Ward will jump, but any decision made by the orgs will be of less significance than the rematch clause.Comment
-
Of course they should.
The first fight was a scam and Sergey has the ability to knock that smug **** out.Comment
-
We're supposed to take these guys seriously and yet, they do things like make polls with loaded options like this. There is no option in the poll for "No, the sanctioning organizations shouldn't order a rematch", which is what most people saying no are trying to say. Almost every single person on the forum agrees that there should be a rematch.
Add this poll with Mr. Objectivity's thread asking for 1-10 on Ward's win over Dawson, but only giving options 1-6.5 in .5 increments, or Jc8804's Ward ducking poll where there are 3 options to say Ward is ducking and 1 option to say "No he is the A-side after schooling Kovalev easily." Where is the "it hasn't been enough time to determine a duck" or "no he isn't ducking" options?Comment
-
We're supposed to take these guys seriously and yet, they do things like make polls with loaded options like this. There is no option in the poll for "No, the sanctioning organizations shouldn't order a rematch", which is what most people saying no are trying to say. Almost every single person on the forum agrees that there should be a rematch.
Add this poll with Mr. Objectivity's thread asking for 1-10 on Ward's win over Dawson, but only giving options 1-6.5 in .5 increments, or Jc8804's Ward ducking poll where there are 3 options to say Ward is ducking and 1 option to say "No he is the A-side after schooling Kovalev easily." Where is the "it hasn't been enough time to determine a duck" or "no he isn't ducking" options?@ your sig
Mr. Objectivity should be Mr. OxymoronComment
-
Comment
-
Comment
Comment