Should the sanctioning organizations order a rematch of Kovalev-Ward?

[The Hammer]

Should the sanctioning organizations (WBO, WBA, IBF) order a rematch of Ward-Kovalev, since most people thought Kovalev won?

Looks like Ward won't honor his rematch clause, so this might be the only way to have him fight Kovalev again.

[The Big Dunn]

If they order a rematch it should be because it was a close fight where the outcome could have gone either way,.

A rematch need not be ordered because you and a few other immature, neo-conservative, alt-right Kov fans are still upset that Ward got the UD.

[The Gambler1981]

They can order a rematch that is fine, but if Ward is not going to honor a contractually obligated rematch clause (which will lead to litigation), why would he care about anything a sanctioning body says?

[Kigali]

They can order a rematch that is fine, but if Ward is not going to honor a contractually obligated rematch clause (which will lead to litigation), why would he care about anything a sanctioning body says?

Who says he's not???

[The Gambler1981]

Who says he's not???

The thread starter said it, so I figured it was part of the premise of the thread. I doubt that is true but if that is the case the sanctioning bodies making any ruling changes nothing in making a rematch occur.

[just the facts]

The thread starter said it, so I figured it was part of the premise of the thread. I doubt that is true but if that is the case the sanctioning bodies making any ruling changes nothing in making a rematch occur.

Don't drink the kool aid, the fight is less than a month old and there's nothing credible saying Ward won't rematch Kovalez.

In my opinion, let Ward have one optional defense (he won the fight) if he wants, then order the rematch.

[The Gambler1981]

Don't drink the kool aid, the fight is less than a month old and there's nothing credible saying Ward won't rematch Kovalez.

In my opinion, let Ward have one optional defense (he won the fight) if he wants, then order the rematch.

They got time to work it out I am unconcerned about it.

[////]

If they order a rematch it should be because it was a close fight where the outcome could have gone either way,.

A rematch need not be ordered because you and a few other immature, neo-conservative, alt-right Kov fans are still upset that Ward got the UD.

That's a commonly encountered oxymoron.

Neo-conservative refers to very ******* **********s & former ********s who invaded the GOP in the '60s through '00s (AKA "cucks").

I think people get confused because the word "neo" reminds them of neo-****s and they think it means "extreme" rather than "new"?

Their deal was giving the evangelists control of social issues in exchange for bringing the ******** platform of open borders and global military interventionism to a previously isolationist party.

The alt-right movement is paleo-conservative and fiercely anti-globalism with relative indifference towards evangelist issues. They are polar opposites.

When you call someone a neo-con in a derogatory manner, you are calling them a fence-sitter, flip-flopper, etc.

[siablo14]

Ward won but I want to see a rematch.

[Cinci Champ]

no it was controversial but not a robbery maybe at some point but if they did that here it would set a precedent to order a rematch everytime any title fight is close. i thought they had a rematch clause anyway