Golovkin is not P4P top 5

[therealpugilist]

Wrong. Golovkin is definitely pound for pound top 3. Its not his fault Ward and Canelo ducked him hard.

GGG doesn't meet the requirements to be top 3 p4p

He has no wins over elite opposition....meaning current top 3 in his division or the division below or above(well he did beat a top 3 welterweight at 160 lol)

he is a unified champion but 2 of the belts he never fought for like the real p4p entrants....who proved they are champions

he hasn't moved up in weight

0 wins over hall of famers

His 35 wins and 4 over titlists is one of the lowest percentages out of anyone considered top ten p4p

he hasn't cleaned out his division which would make up for not moving up


All he has is hype and impressive eye test results vs C class an B opposition.....not one A class fighter on his resume

Ward, Kov, Chocolatito, Loma, Crawford, Rigondeaux, and several others are more proven and have accomplished more than GGG....the eye test isn't the only aspect of p4p...sorry

[Mequetrefe]

Hes on top of the top 5 pound for pound

[hugh grant]

Gggg should be noi1. The standards are higher foir him. He has to outbox as well as ko fighters.

Plus he kos everyone. Nelo don't ko all the bums he fought. But nelo is sactually getting g better now. By the tim e nelo fight SSM , ssm was pretty much bum status and couldn't ko old bum.

You can't judhpge it just on who you beat because khan would be expe ted to beat brook just cos khan has better resume. Plus people could just duck GGG to deny GGG. You must be compensated for being ducked. That's only fair in an unjust world

[Illmatic94]

if murray vs martinez took place somewhere other than argentina..we're looking at murray the wbc middleweight champ of the world..and ggg's win over him looks much more impressive..beat the man who beat the man.

macklin, lemieux, stevens, monroe and brook are also solid wins..

ok brook moved up from welter..why we pretend we've never seen that before?..so was hagler vs leonard a joke as well? ..monroe gives anybody not named ggg problems with his evasive southpaw style, just ask canelos team why they rejected him as an opponent (lara flashbacks).

the reason why ggg's resume is ridiculed..the real reason ..is because he's running through these guys without losing rounds, he's crushing these guys..if ggg was winning all these fights by decision (like hopkins MW reign) nobody would care. .ggg needs to tone it down and look more vulnerable.

[_Maxi]

For a while, he was. Now, the resume is becoming an issue because there's a lot of other top guys taking good fights. Without any noteworthy wins he's getting passed by. Hopefully he goes after something bigger. Waiting around on guys like BJS (who looks like garbage now) isn't legacy building. He's capable of much more.

We should have seen Golovkin-Jacobs this week! ****** jacobsssss

[hugh grant]

the reason why ggg's resume is ridiculed..the real reason ..is because he's running through these guys without losing rounds, he's crushing these guys..if ggg was winning all these fights by decision (like hopkins MW reign) nobody would care. .ggg needs to tone it down and look more vulnerable.

He looked vulnerable!ke agai st brook supposedly then GGG became overated? Even though brook got koed.
See thge standards for GGG are higher. The standards for highest rlated fighters always are high

[Tony Trick-Pony]

When you've cleaned out a division and called out everybody in that division, that is worthy of being ranked highly on the list. Hopefully the Jacobs and Canelo fights happen soon. He does need names and from what I've seen, the ducking has been real. So it's hard to blame GGG. He's a couple of fights away from being undisputed champion and the only undisputed champion in boxing which is saying something.

That said, of course I'd like to see him face the DeGale-Jack winner or other 168-pounders.

[Illmatic94]

He looked vulnerable!ke agai st brook supposedly then GGG became overated? Even though brook got koed.
See thge standards for GGG are higher. The standards for highest rlated fighters always are high

i mean if we're gonna **** on ggg for the brook fight..why do we give hopkins credit for beating tito and oscar (his two biggest wins as middleweight)?

[Larry the boss]

Talent wise he is. I would put him above Crawford since Limeux is p4p better than anyone Crawford has fought.

Based on what exactly?? Postol had a far better win then Lemiuex has ever had

[Larry the boss]

Rigo has fought 2 top20 contenders in his life.

You're another alt troll parroting garbage without bothering to use your head.

Rigo's Donaire win kills anything on GGG's resume man and he has over half less fights than GGG