Top 10 P4P fighters with resume being the #1 factor

[Sadiqkingofko]

1. A. Ward 31-0(15) (175) WBA (Super), WBO, IBF
2. M. Pacquaio 59-6-2(38) (147) WBO, Lineal
3. R. Gonzalez 46-0(38) (115) WBC
4. S. Kovalev 30-1-1(26) (175)
5. T. Crawford 29-0(20) (140) WBC, WBO, Ring, Lineal
6. C. Alvarez 48-1-1(34) (154) WBO | (160) Ring, Lineal
7. V. Lomachenko 7-1(5) (130) WBO
8. G. Rigondeaux 17-0(11) (122) WBA (Super), Lineal
9. W. Klitschko 64-4(53) (201+)
10. C. Frampton 23-0(14) (126) WBA (Super)

This is my top 10, if we want top 25 and all weights super bantamweight and above rankings check out this

http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/showthread.php?p=17118175

[Madison Boxing]

gennady golovkin

[just the facts]

gennady golovkin

I know your boxing IQ is low and your man crush runs so deep that you would provide oral gratification to g string but TS said based on resume not ******ity.

[LoadedWraps]

1. A. Ward 31-0(15) (175) WBA (Super), WBO, IBF
2. M. Pacquaio 59-6-2(38) (147) WBO, Lineal
3. R. Gonzalez 46-0(38) (115) WBC
4. S. Kovalev 30-1-1(26) (175)
5. T. Crawford 29-0(20) (140) WBC, WBO, Ring, Lineal
6. C. Alvarez 48-1-1(34) (154) WBO | (160) Ring, Lineal
7. V. Lomachenko 7-1(5) (130) WBO
8. G. Rigondeaux 17-0(11) (122) WBA (Super), Lineal
9. W. Klitschko 64-4(53) (201+)
10. C. Frampton 23-0(14) (126) WBA (Super)

This is my top 10, if we want top 25 and all weights super bantamweight and above rankings check out this
http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/sh...php?p=17118175

If you go off of resume alone there is no way Ward is above Pac.



It takes a heck of a lot for a Flowmoe like me to say something positive about PEDquiao but my goodness, this is ridiculous.

[Sadiqkingofko]

If you go off of resume alone there is no way Ward is above Pac.



It takes a heck of a lot for a Flowmoe like me to say something positive about PEDquiao but my goodness, this is ridiculous.

resume with recent wins and losses as well

[W1LL]

"Pound-for-pound" was a name first applied to Sugar Ray Robinson after he won the Middleweight title and defended it a few times. He'd previously been Welterweight champion. The emphasis was on his moving through weight classes and dominating. Going off this logic, Sergey Kovalev, Gennady Golovkin and Wladimir Klitschko don't qualify.

[Illmatic94]

resume only p4p
1- pacquiao 2- hopkins 3- ward 4- marquez (not retired yet) 5- canelo 6- garcia 7- kovalev 8- cotto 9- bradley 10- wlad

of course p4p is also determined by activity, boxing skills and recent performance.

[LoadedWraps]

resume with recent wins and losses as well

It doesn't matter it's still not even defendable or debatable. Even if you ranked any one of Wards wins as better than any of Pac's wins (which would be false to begin with) Pac is the answer based on sheer volume and size of resume. None of Pac's recent losses or any loss than can happen here on out will really bring down his resume, it's pretty much set in stone as a career goes, similar to B-Hop, Floyd before he retired, etc.

[Larry the boss]

1-Ward
2-Pacqiao
3-Kovalev
4-Canelo
5-Chocalito
6-Lomachenko
7-Crawford
8-Wlad
9-Frampton
10-Rigo

[Mr. Objectivity]

LOL at WARD TARDS.