Pound For Pound Rankings!!!

[Sadiqkingofko]

Overall a good list. Certainly better than those that have Lomachenko and Golovkin in the top 3.

thanks bro, I look at resume before anything else

[Illmatic94]

thanks bro, I look at resume before anything else

resume wise pacquiao is hands down p4p #1..only resume you can put next to his is hopkins.

resume p4p
1. pac 2. bhop 3. ward 4. danny 5. kovalev

most ppl don't just go by resume, they factor in how good and dominant the boxer looked in previous performance. with that lomachenko is #1.

resume
skill set
willingness to take risks
previous performance

all these things must be factored in. if you mesh all those things together lomachenko has a strong case to be #1.

[Sadiqkingofko]

resume wise pacquiao is hands down p4p #1..only resume you can put next to his is hopkins.

resume p4p
1. pac 2. bhop 3. ward 4. danny 5. kovalev

most ppl don't just go by resume, they factor in how good and dominant the boxer looked in previous performance. with that lomachenko is #1.

resume
skill set
willingness to take risks
previous performance

all these things must be factored in. if you mesh all those things together lomachenko has a strong case to be #1.

I look at resume from the last 6 fights, and only if there within the last 3 years, Pacquaio's last 6 fights have bean : Vargas W, Bradley W, Mayweather L, Algeri W, Bradley W, Rios W : other than Bradley he hasn't beaten top comepetition
Garcia's last 6 fights have been : Vargas W, Gurrero W, Malinaggi W, Peterson W(?), Salka W, Herrera W(?)
Only one good win and it was debatable if he won

[Illmatic94]

I look at resume from the last 6 fights, and only if there within the last 3 years, Pacquaio's last 6 fights have bean : Vargas W, Bradley W, Mayweather L, Algeri W, Bradley W, Rios W : other than Bradley he hasn't beaten top comepetition
Garcia's last 6 fights have been : Vargas W, Gurrero W, Malinaggi W, Peterson W(?), Salka W, Herrera W(?)
Only one good win and it was debatable if he won

from novermber 16, 2013 - november 19, 2016 ward's resume: rodriguez, smith, barrera, brand, kovalev(?)

if you're gonna put a question mark over garcias victories over peterson and herrera just because they were close and debatable, same has to be done for ward's win against kovalev. so in three years ward has defeated four guys not on his level and one elite guy in controversial fashion..is that really p4p #1 material? ..

ward is only #1 if you factor in his resume going all the way back to the super six. .using your "only last 3 years" rule, ward is arguably not even in the top five.

[Sadiqkingofko]

from novermber 16, 2013 - november 19, 2016 ward's resume: rodriguez, smith, barrera, brand, kovalev(?)

if you're gonna put a question mark over garcias victories over peterson and herrera just because they were close and debatable, same has to be done for ward's win against kovalev. so in three years ward has defeated four guys not on his level and one elite guy in controversial fashion..is that really p4p #1 material? ..

ward is only #1 if you factor in his resume going all the way back to the super six. .using your "only last 3 years" rule, ward is arguably not even in the top five.

I had Kovalev at #2 before there fight, that has to be the best win anyone has accomplished in the last three years (esp since Floyd retired), you don't see other P4P fighters fighting other P4P fighters

[Illmatic94]

I had Kovalev at #2 before there fight, that has to be the best win anyone has accomplished in the last three years (esp since Floyd retired), you don't see other P4P fighters fighting other P4P fighters

true..but don't you factor in the controversial nature of that win? im not saying he lost, im saying its debatable..so to be fair ward should be 1a and kovalev 1b..until the rematch puts some separation between them. .or you can make the case kovalev is 1a because his win over hopkins (11-8-14) is more impressive than barrera, rodriguez, smith and brand combined. ..50 year old bhop would probably beat all four of those guys in one night.

[Robbie Barrett]

resume wise pacquiao is hands down p4p #1..only resume you can put next to his is hopkins.

resume p4p
1. pac 2. bhop 3. ward 4. danny 5. kovalev

most ppl don't just go by resume, they factor in how good and dominant the boxer looked in previous performance. with that lomachenko is #1.

resume
skill set
willingness to take risks
previous performance

all these things must be factored in. if you mesh all those things together lomachenko has a strong case to be #1.

Pacquiao has beaten better comp in his last 2 fights than Loma has. Bradley is better than anyone on Loma's resume. Kovalev and Ward both proved they belong at the top of the sport. Lomachenko looks good but he hasn't fought or beat A level P4P fighters.