charlo v golovkin

[koolkc107]

From the looks of things, Rosado and Ishida have done a lot of moving up and down. I really don't care what the broadcast said, both fighters have fought in the MW division a dozen times or more. That's not a career JMW.

As far as Jacobs, the WBA has said he deserves 25%. That's not Golovkin. That's the sanctioning body. We can't blame Golovkin for that. We can't blame Golovkin for Saunders wanting lottery money to fight. We can't blame Golovkin for Eubank losing his pen. We can't blame Golovkin for Johnson taking, what, 14 months off between fights. We can't blame Canelo for giving his belt away and starving himself to make 154.

The point you are NEVER going to get around is that Lil g has come to prominence partly due to the fact that he regularly fought guys who had very recently been campaigning at lower weightclasses, and that he CHOSE THOSE MEN INSTEAD OF OPPONENTS FROM HIS OWN WEIGHTCLASS.

And I disagree with you about who we can blame.

We readily say that it was OK for Lil g to have turned down an offer over 3 times his career high pay day from GBP to fight Canelo.

But we blame Jacobs and Eubanks and Saunders for wanting to be treated as well as Lemieux when it comes to a purse when each make a pretty good argument about being better than David.

But, can I get you on record here since you want to act like it isn't Loeffler hiding behind the WBA?

Since you want to cite it, do you agree that when it goes to purse bid, both fighters should be bound to the outcome no matter who wins it?

That both fighters should honor the outcome and go through with the fight?

[BrometheusBob.]

This dude's fight night weight is comparable to Miguel Cotto's and yet y'all are begging him to move up because he's too big.

[-DSG-]

Let me see how G looks vs Jacobs first.

[-DSG-]

This dude's fight night weight is comparable to Miguel Cotto's and yet y'all are begging him to move up because he's too big.

Charlo already said he wants to move up.

[BrometheusBob.]

Charlo already said he wants to move up.

I have no problem with the fight with GGG, for the record. Just funny how there are posters against him staying at 154 at all costs.

[-DSG-]

I have no problem with the fight with GGG, for the record. Just funny how there are posters against him staying at 154 at all costs.

I'd like to see him move up 160 needs some new blood and we already know he isn't going to fight his bro or his gym mate Lara.
Charlo could beat anyone at 160.

[BrometheusBob.]

I'd like to see him move up 160 needs some new blood and we already know he isn't going to fight his bro or his gym mate Lara.
Charlo could beat anyone at 160.

True I'd like him to beat BJS and Jacobs. GGG is a tougher call.

[GGG Gloveking]

The point you are NEVER going to get around is that Lil g has come to prominence partly due to the fact that he regularly fought guys who had very recently been campaigning at lower weightclasses, and that he CHOSE THOSE MEN INSTEAD OF OPPONENTS FROM HIS OWN WEIGHTCLASS.

And I disagree with you about who we can blame.

We readily say that it was OK for Lil g to have turned down an offer over 3 times his career high pay day from GBP to fight Canelo.

But we blame Jacobs and Eubanks and Saunders for wanting to be treated as well as Lemieux when it comes to a purse when each make a pretty good argument about being better than David.

But, can I get you on record here since you want to act like it isn't Loeffler hiding behind the WBA?

Since you want to cite it, do you agree that when it goes to purse bid, both fighters should be bound to the outcome no matter who wins it?

That both fighters should honor the outcome and go through with the fight?

Recently campaigning at isn't quite the same as never fought at, or making a debut at. In that respect, I'll agree that Reside had been recently campaigning at JMW. But none of those guys had just made a debut at 160.

And I'll absolutely go on record saying that both fighters should honor the outcome of the purse bid. I don't want to see either side vacate the belt. I'm a fan of fights, not politics and financial BS. I don't want to hear, "Oh, I'm a HBO fighter" if Haymon wins the bid. And I don't want to hear, "Oh, the money ain't right" if K2 wins the bid. I want to see the damn fight! I don't care whether it's at MSG or Barclay's (or the Walmart parking lot). I don't care whether it's on HBO or Showtime (or TeleMundo). I want to see leather being thrown by the two best MWs in the world today. I don't want to hear "GGG got exposed", or "Jacobs was a cab driver". These two are the two best MWs in the world, and all I want is to see a fight.

Is that good enough as being "on the record"?

[.:: JSFD26 ::.]

Lol the irony of a Rigotard.

Get your reading comprehension up, mate. It's weak just like your posts.

Rigo hasn't fought smaller guys. In fact, his best win, unlike Golovkin, WAS vs a much larger guy.

[Hype job]

Get your reading comprehension up, mate. It's weak just like your posts.

Rigo hasn't fought smaller guys. In fact, his best win, unlike Golovkin, WAS vs a much larger guy.

He still won't move up to face bigger threats doe.