Hopkins/Jones jr./Toney

[blockhead]

Defintly
Jones Jr. Watch a ****ing tape or something

Toney His defense is prolific, his offesnse puzzeling and he can ****ing box!

B_HOP he dominated a divison for like 20 years and is the ****ing executioner(would be higher had he did what jr and toney did by gaining titles in different divisions 4+ each)

There all awesome but thats how it is and should look

definately jones huh? i like watching him fight nobodies that would fall down if jones farted in their direction. and as far as him beating toney and hopkins, there is a reason why they didnt get rematches. that reason is that they would have his number and both would have beaten him.

[ROSEWOOD]

definately jones huh? i like watching him fight nobodies that would fall down if jones farted in their direction. and as far as him beating toney and hopkins, there is a reason why they didnt get rematches. that reason is that they would have his number and both would have beaten him.

playa..I totally agree with you on that...he ran from those rematches...****ing *****!!!

[beezy 14]

Ferocity how old was Leonard when he lost to Camacho? Don't compare that to how Winky dominated Tito because Tito was younger then Winky. And all these comparisons don't work anyway because all these people had way more name wins then Margorito, why would somebody on the elite level be afraid of him? They just don't want high risk low reward fights,he hasn't eben been in there with an A level fighter. He's good but there is still more to see on him and you know that.

[ferocity]

Ferocity how old was Leonard when he lost to Camacho? Don't compare that to how Winky dominated Tito because Tito was younger then Winky. And all these comparisons don't work anyway because all these people had way more name wins then Margorito, why would somebody on the elite level be afraid of him? They just don't want high risk low reward fights,he hasn't eben been in there with an A level fighter. He's good but there is still more to see on him and you know that.

damn, sounds like you are talking about winky, you must be talking about winky....

[wmute]

Jones jr.

Hopkins/Toney (want to see what happens next to decide)

Jones beat them both fair and square, and when in the future someone will look at his record, people will say:
f-+k! this guy beat HOPKINS and TONEY. He must have been awesome!

although the more I boxed and the more I watched boxing, the more i liked toney or hop stylewise better than rj (probably I am just jealous, because I slowly realized that the psyco-physical talents required to fight like jones are really exceptional). Also no one could hand Jones his ass until he was 35.

[Piggu]

1. Bernard Hopkins
2. Roy Jones
3. James Toney

[phallus]

Jones jr.

Hopkins/Toney (want to see what happens next to decide)

Jones beat them both fair and square, and when in the future someone will look at his record, people will say:
f-+k! this guy beat HOPKINS and TONEY. He must have been awesome!

although the more I boxed and the more I watched boxing, the more i liked toney or hop stylewise better than rj (probably I am just jealous, because I slowly realized that the psyco-physical talents required to fight like jones are really exceptional). Also no one could hand Jones his ass until he was 35.

toney has as much natural talent as RJJ, it's just that he doesn't have the dazzling speed. u could rate them all based on talent or based on career, but the ratings would be different, hopkins has the least natural talent but he's smarter than jones or toney