Comments Thread For: Lomachenko Takes Over Top Spot on CompuBox Plus/Minus List

[aboutfkntime]

those stats are bull****, these clowns should keep their maths to themselves..... boxing is not a maths game

in saying that, Loma is a truly outstanding fighter, he has been on my P4P list for quite some time..... and he will be #1

[Larry the boss]

You can say he only fought 7 times..when it is really 8...yea he fought 8 times....and in those 8 fights he is a 2 weight title holder and his combines opponents records are

222-26


lets not act like he is fighting bums

[Larry the boss]

Lomachenko has also fought better oppenents than rigo + he has never been KD unlike rigo.

Donaire at the time Rigo fought him was top 5 p4p..Loma has 0 fights with any p4p fighter so NO!!

[TheCell8]

This is a non story. With such a small sample size this means absolutely nothing. Lomanchenko is a great fighter but this stat is flawed because he's only fought 7 times. He is no doubt one of the best fighters in the world if not the best. Imagine Lomanchenko vs Rigondeux that would be a boxing fan dream. I'd pay for front row tickets for that fight. As always Boxing lives on.

But keep in mind that compubox has only recorded stats for a certain number of fights, not a fighters entire career.

For example, when they show Golovkin's stats is that including all 33 of his fights or is just including the fights where he fought on HBO? Because if it's just HBO, then the sample size for Golovkin is 13, not all of his 33.

I imagine it would be hard to collect stats on his earlier fights that took place in Germany because there isn't footage. The same goes for Floyd and a lot of the other fights on that list.

A lot of those fighters have the same sample size as Lomachenko's and some even less of a sample size.

Compubox has all 7 of Lomachenko's fights because he's only fought on HBO and Showtime. So i think the sample size is pretty representative.

[richardt]

Kinda surprised, he throws a lot of throw away punches, but he's accurate offensively when he looks to be.

More specifically, he varies the intensity on his punches so that the opponent doesn't know when a hard punch is coming, where it is intended to land, and he uses the lower intensity punches mixed in to perplex the opponent. Even a viewer cannot tell which punches will be setup punches and which will have full power. That's the genius of his game. And even punches that seem lighter can have enough on them to cause pain because they come at angles that the opponent finds hard to block and sometimes even see. I had to look closer at him to demystify his actions. Sure, I know what he is doing, I figured it out, but even if I was a top boxer and I don't box, I would still have an issue dissecting live how to respond to his matrix of being in many places at the same time or so it seems the same time. I see a combination of Whitaker and Pac in him which is pretty neat really. Pac the harder hitter and Whitaker better on defense but many of those attributes.

[Dr Rumack]

Fucking compubox. Proof that people will believe just about anything you present in numerical format.

[richardt]

The jealousy is so great that they will even resort to compare Lomachenko to their idol The Head ****** Clown......it is funny how pathetic these ******clowns are.

Dude, drop the ******clown stuff.

[aboutfkntime]

You can say he only fought 7 times..when it is really 8...yea he fought 8 times....and in those 8 fights he is a 2 weight title holder and his combines opponents records are

222-26


lets not act like he is fighting bums

that is not how averages work, after 30+ fights we will see

[aboutfkntime]

Fucking compubox. Proof that people will believe just about anything you present in numerical format.

bingo ! SMH

[Larry the boss]

that is not how averages work, after 30+ fights we will see

No problem with that but lets not act like he is fighting the comp of regular fighters with 8 fights