P4P Rankings After Lomachenko/Walters

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Robbie Barrett
    Banned
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Nov 2013
    • 40891
    • 2,779
    • 667
    • 570,921

    #11
    Originally posted by bigdramashow
    lomachenko
    golovkin
    kovalev
    pacquiao
    ward
    frampton
    crawford
    gonzalez
    rigondeaux
    thurman
    Worst list you'll see on the forum. Lomachenko #1 for beating Walters? Pacquiao has a dominate win over a better fighter than Walters this year why isn't he #1? Golovkin "worst P4P resume in history" at #2? Terrible.

    Comment

    • Madison Boxing
      Banned
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Jul 2015
      • 35364
      • 6,455
      • 3,367
      • 190,590

      #12
      Originally posted by Isaac Clarke
      Worst list you'll see on the forum. Lomachenko #1 for beating Walters? Pacquiao has a dominate win over a better fighter than Walters this year why isn't he #1? Golovkin "worst P4P resume in history" at #2? Terrible.
      lets see yours then 'paulie'. Vargas better than walters, deluded. Who has vargas beat who is in the same leage as donaire. Walters has gone from world class to bum on this forum now hes lost.

      Comment

      • Robbie Barrett
        Banned
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Nov 2013
        • 40891
        • 2,779
        • 667
        • 570,921

        #13
        Originally posted by bigdramashow
        lets see yours then 'paulie'. Vargas better than walters, deluded. Who has vargas beat who is in the same leage as donaire. Walters has gone from world class to bum on this forum now hes lost.
        Bradley is a better fighter than Walters. Pacquiao dominated him, i see nobody claiming Pacquiao should be #1 but people want to put Lomachenko #1 for a win over Walters.

        Comment

        • Madison Boxing
          Banned
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Jul 2015
          • 35364
          • 6,455
          • 3,367
          • 190,590

          #14
          Originally posted by Isaac Clarke
          Bradley is a better fighter than Walters. Pacquiao dominated him, i see nobody claiming Pacquiao should be #1 but people want to put Lomachenko #1 for a win over Walters.
          lomachenko is the best fighter on the planet, absolutely dominated gary russell and nicholas walters who are both world class. Has also demolished some good b level fighters. Pacquiao is declining, didnt look his best against vargas, mayweather boxed rings around him, marquez knocked him unconscious. Dread to think what your p4p list would be, load of **** most likely

          Comment

          • Robbie Barrett
            Banned
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Nov 2013
            • 40891
            • 2,779
            • 667
            • 570,921

            #15
            Originally posted by bigdramashow
            lomachenko is the best fighter on the planet, absolutely dominated gary russell and nicholas walters who are both world class. Has also demolished some good b level fighters. Pacquiao is declining, didnt look his best against vargas, mayweather boxed rings around him, marquez knocked him unconscious. Dread to think what your p4p list would be, load of **** most likely
            Who are the better fighters, Bradley and Vargas or Martinez and Walters? Both guys dominated their opponents, so how can you move Lomachenko ahead of Pacquiao when Pacquiao beat the better quality fighters?

            Comment

            • Madison Boxing
              Banned
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Jul 2015
              • 35364
              • 6,455
              • 3,367
              • 190,590

              #16
              Originally posted by Isaac Clarke
              Who are the better fighters, Bradley and Vargas or Martinez and Walters? Both guys dominated their opponents, so how can you move Lomachenko ahead of Pacquiao when Pacquiao beat the better quality fighters?
              cause he looked near on unbeatable in them wins, has also schooled gary russell. Only blip is losing in his second pro fight, has looked phenomenal since.

              Comment

              • Robbie Barrett
                Banned
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Nov 2013
                • 40891
                • 2,779
                • 667
                • 570,921

                #17
                Originally posted by bigdramashow
                cause he looked near on unbeatable in them wins, has also schooled gary russell. Only blip is losing in his second pro fight, has looked phenomenal since.
                Pacquiao looked unbeatable against better quality fighters.

                You can't justify it other than your personal bias.

                Comment

                • Madison Boxing
                  Banned
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Jul 2015
                  • 35364
                  • 6,455
                  • 3,367
                  • 190,590

                  #18
                  Originally posted by Isaac Clarke
                  Pacquiao looked unbeatable against better quality fighters.

                  You can't justify it other than your personal bias.
                  ive justified it mate. dont think you actually watched them pacquiao fights, did you. In fact i dont think you watch any boxing.

                  Comment

                  • bojangles1987
                    bo jungle
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Jul 2009
                    • 41118
                    • 1,326
                    • 357
                    • 63,028

                    #19
                    Originally posted by soul_survivor
                    Bradley, Canelo and Crawford all deserve a shout in that argument tbh
                    I did forget Crawford, which is inexcusable. He's definitely in that group. I don't think Alvarez should be, though he's close. And as big a Bradley fan as I am, he doesn't belong. Been a long time since he picked up a great win and he hasn't looked that good lately.

                    Comment

                    • Robbie Barrett
                      Banned
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Nov 2013
                      • 40891
                      • 2,779
                      • 667
                      • 570,921

                      #20
                      Originally posted by bigdramashow
                      ive justified it mate. dont think you actually watched them pacquiao fights, did you. In fact i dont think you watch any boxing.
                      No you haven't. On resume and performance there's no way you possibly could have Lomachenko #1 unless you're very biased.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP