Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

"Pac-Man" Pacquiao vs "Hi-Tech" Lomachenko @ 140 lbs / 10 Stone: Who wins?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #51
    Vamos Lomachenko!!!!

    Comment


    • #52
      loma takes this.........

      Comment


      • #53
        140 might be too much for a small framed guy like him. Much of his game is speed and reflexes, which might diminish with those extra lbs.

        Comment


        • #54
          Originally posted by deanrw View Post
          140 might be too much for a small framed guy like him. Much of his game is speed and reflexes, which might diminish with those extra lbs.

          If you are talking about Lomachenko, I don't think he would be much slower with a few extra lbs, it's not a huge jump in size like a SMW moving up to LHW or HW for example.

          Comment


          • #55
            I love Manny but he can't beat Loma right now

            Comment


            • #56
              Pac by TKO. Pac's ability to throw a hook when the opponents move around to pivot out of the way would be the reason why. If Bradley can't avoid those hooks then Loma would probably be not that far ahead. And with both high precision on those hooks and Loma's habit to fight on side to side then I would give Manny a late round TKO win over Loma after a fight of the year and footwork battle of the year match.

              Comment


              • #57
                Originally posted by Thraxox View Post
                Pac by TKO. Pac's ability to throw a hook when the opponents move around to pivot out of the way would be the reason why. If Bradley can't avoid those hooks then Loma would probably be not that far ahead. And with both high precision on those hooks and Loma's habit to fight on side to side then I would give Manny a late round TKO win over Loma after a fight of the year and footwork battle of the year match.
                As much as I have praised Bradley's ring IQ and defense on here with NSB insisting on underrating him, Lomachenko's defense is better. And definitely better than Mannys.

                Comment


                • #58
                  Originally posted by LoadedWraps View Post
                  As much as I have praised Bradley's ring IQ and defense on here with NSB insisting on underrating him, Lomachenko's defense is better. And definitely better than Mannys.
                  Pacquiao is elusive in the pocket also, he can defend just as he throws. We don't know much about Loma with Nicholas Walters. But eye to eye test Lomachenko is ahead of Pacquiao in terms of pure talent but it is yet to be tested with a fighter with the Caliber of Bradley.

                  Comment


                  • #59
                    Originally posted by Thraxox View Post
                    Pacquiao is elusive in the pocket also, he can defend just as he throws. We don't know much about Loma with Nicholas Walters. But eye to eye test Lomachenko is ahead of Pacquiao in terms of pure talent but it is yet to be tested with a fighter with the Caliber of Bradley.

                    Comment


                    • #60
                      Originally posted by LoadedWraps View Post
                      Check Bradley 3

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP