73% of 60 boxing media people scored it for Sergey Kovalev

[Pain~Lucy]

May God bless them

[IronDanHamza]

cheers guys , i was gonna post my work this morning , not done a score collection for nearly 2 years.....hope you enjoy

How come you haven't done one in so long?

They're always very insightful it's great to see you back.

[The Hammer]

So 27% didn't have him winning aka it wasn't a robbery.

It was a robbery.

The people who scored it for Ward were biased. Some people don't like Russians because of the cold war, others always support black boxers. Notice that nearly everyone saying Ward won has a black boxer in his avatar.

Kovalev clearly won. You are one of those who will always support Ward over any Russian, no matter what.

[-Makunouchi-]

It was as clear as sunshine that kovalev won, Even zeus, odin and allah all saw it Kovalev winning!

[The Hammer]

It was as clear as sunshine that kovalev won, Even zeus, odin and allah all saw it Kovalev winning!

Kovalev is the peoples' champ.

[Long jabber]

stop using logical fallacies

In argumentation theory, an argumentum ad populum (Latin for "appeal to the people") is a fallacious argument that concludes that a proposition is true because many or most people believe it: "If many believe so, it is so."


he lost get over it

[Thraxox]

stop using logical fallacies

In argumentation theory, an argumentum ad populum (Latin for "appeal to the people") is a fallacious argument that concludes that a proposition is true because many or most people believe it: "If many believe so, it is so."


he lost get over it

So let's debate the **** out of this then if that was a logical fallacy. Round by Round, second by second.

Criteria to win a round. Ring Generalship, punches landed, Defense, clean and effective punching, and especially AGGRESSION.

[1hourRun]

Im about to get the GIFs out in slow-motion....this is ridiculous so called ' Professionals ' dont know how to score.

[The Hammer]

stop using logical fallacies

In argumentation theory, an argumentum ad populum (Latin for "appeal to the people") is a fallacious argument that concludes that a proposition is true because many or most people believe it: "If many believe so, it is so."


he lost get over it

No, Kovalev won.

He's the peoples' champ.

[GMAN SUPREME]

even stevie wonder can see that kovalev won.