Comments Thread For: Kell Brook: I Inspired Pacquiao To Return, We Should Unify!

[ShoulderRoll]

TlWhy would Brook get criticism for this? Its a tougher fight for him, if we look past the obnoxious overrating that Spence gets on here.

Overrating? Spence is his mandatory.

Yet Brook talks about fighting everyone except Spence.

[Bullrider]

I'd like to see this fight in May 2017. Brook vs Pac, make it happen!

[techliam]

Overrating? Spence is his mandatory.

Yet Brook talks about fighting everyone except Spence.

Oh, we are into the whole mandatory thing now it fits our agenda? A lot of these posters didn't have the same view when it was enforced on Golovkin. Shameless.

Dropping your title to avoid a mandatory is indefensible, postponing a mandatory to pursue a more difficult, more lucrative unification fight is common sense.

[AliBombaye]

12 years a pro, 1 good win, a TRILOGY with a bum who he beat on points all 3 times, need I say more?

Go home you bum, hopefully the next man you extend your services to won't aim for the leg.

[ShoulderRoll]

Oh, we are into the whole mandatory thing now it fits our agenda? A lot of these posters didn't have the same view when it was enforced on Golovkin. Shameless.

Nice try.

But while I have repeatedly said Dominic Wade was an awful opponent I also specifically said that there wasn't much Golovkin could do about it in that instance since he was a mandatory. So you can take that garbage somewhere else.

If Spence is too high risk and too low reward than Brook should just drop the belt. Then he can go fight whoever he wants.

[techliam]

Nice try.

But while I have repeatedly said Dominic Wade was an awful opponent I also specifically said that there wasn't much Golovkin could do about it in that instance since he was a mandatory. So you can take that garbage somewhere else.

If Spence is too high risk and too low reward than Brook should just drop the belt. Then he can go fight whoever he wants.

Spence isn't high risk too low reward. He's further down the priority list if a lucrative unification fight is possible (which all sanctioning bodies specifically allow for). Why Brook would be criticised for this move perplexes me. Pacquiao is a much better fighter than Spence. I would agree if Brook would be fighting a lesser fighter instead of Spence, but it doesn't seem to be the case