Champions don't fight enough

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Tony Trick-Pony
    Banned
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Feb 2014
    • 16950
    • 1,408
    • 3,121
    • 139,355

    #11
    Originally posted by Mammoth
    Back in the good ol' days when the best fought the best. People would lose and people wouldn't act like they're bums because of a loss. People liked the fact that they had the balls to consistently be in great fights.

    Today DeGale and Jack get in the ring and it's supposed to be amazing some how.
    There is way too much emphasis put on the "0". I don't care if a fighter has losses. Most of them do. If he can come back from those setbacks and keep going, he looks a lot tougher than a guy's who's never lost or of course, even been truly tested in the ring. There is no invincibility anyway. Any fighter can lose to any other fighter on any given night. Otherwise, what would be the point?

    Comment

    • soul_survivor
      LOL @ Ali-Holmes
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Jun 2013
      • 18949
      • 623
      • 473
      • 65,236

      #12
      Originally posted by Mammoth
      Back in the good ol' days when the best fought the best. People would lose and people wouldn't act like they're bums because of a loss. People liked the fact that they had the balls to consistently be in great fights.

      Today DeGale and Jack get in the ring and it's supposed to be amazing some how.
      hahahaha spot on

      By the time the fight actually happens, it would have had almost 2 years worth of build. That's crazy.

      Comment

      Working...
      TOP