Is The Ring Magazine P4P Top 10 Rankings a Joke?

[pesticid]

Now Jorge Arce was a 4 division champ too

[pesticid]

Yeah, he's a clown. I try to keep the convo to boxing fans only lately. Takes a while to weed them out though. Time to keep it moving.

You started a troll argument you lost on a troll argument. Keep it moving

[The Akbar One]

I agree except for Alvarez shouldn't be on the list part.

My problem with putting Alvarez on it is that he needed questionable judging to get his two best wins. I thought he lost to both Trout, and Lara. He also wasn't competitive with Mayweather at all. Outside of Frampton who shouldn't be on the list either, everyone else has emphatic, clear wins over top opposition. Canelo doesn't have that. He can change that by taking out some of the good young talent at 154, but something tells me that Oscar will hide him from the Andrades, Charlos, Williams, and Soros of the division, just like he is keeping him away from Golovkin at 160.

[pesticid]

My problem with putting Alvarez on it is that he needed questionable judging to get his two best wins. I thought he lost to both Trout, and Lara. He also wasn't competitive with Mayweather at all. Outside of Frampton who shouldn't be on the list either, everyone else has emphatic, clear wins over top opposition. Canelo doesn't have that. He can change that by taking out some of the good young talent at 154, but something tells me that Oscar will hide him from the Andrades, Charlos, Williams, and Soros of the division, just like he is keeping him away from Golovkin at 160.

His best win was Cotto actually and there was nothing questionable about it. So yeah his fights could've gone either way with Lara and maybe even Trout although the knockdown I think sealed it. And even if you disagree with the judging, he did fight the best and the fights weren't robberies.