Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: WBO Prez To Canelo Critics: Why Did Golovkin Reject Andre Ward!

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    Originally posted by HeroBando View Post
    I know he said that dummy, when everyone 154-168 was A side to him. Then Hbo pulled him and Ward in, are you ready to fight? Ggg is ready, Ward has some excuse. Hbo is impressed. While Ward is losing lawsuits Ggg is gaining fans and making himself the A side to everyone above Canelo weight.
    How with his 97 ppv fail? Golovkin never agreed to fight Ward you little ******, he's admitted he made it up.

    I pity your racist life.

    Comment


    • #42
      Originally posted by boxingitis View Post
      http://www.boxingscene.com/andre-ward-mayweather-ill-go-160-fight-you--63365

      Stop protecting Ward
      Did he say anyone you moron? Golovkin did.

      Comment


      • #43
        Originally posted by frantic fighter View Post
        I normally would be first in line to crap on Golovkin,but this guy Paco rubs me the wrong way. He want even attempt to disguise his dirtiness. I've been skeptical for awhile about Top Rank and WBO titles,this pretty much sealed it. This guy is a dirt bag and needs to be investigated.
        Because he said the truth? Lol ggg= bside

        Comment


        • #44
          Originally posted by CaneloMaidana View Post
          Did he say anyone you moron? Golovkin did.
          U moron anyone that makes financial sense. So u defend Ward because he didnt meet GGG at 164. U sure want GGG to lose , you want Ward to have an advantage vs GGG, like he had vs Dawson, atleast make it even. Ur hate GGG is unbelivable. 160 for mayweather but no GGG for 3 MW titles vs none at SMW fight. Ward didnt take right nor did GGG.

          Comment


          • #45
            Originally posted by boxingitis View Post
            Ward said he was willing to go down to 160 for Mayweather, yet he couldnt meet GGG at 164. Dont defend Ward and not GGG for doing the exact same thing.
            http://www.boxingscene.com/andre-war...ght-you--63365
            You shot yourself in the foot there.
            He offered Floyd 160 and Money never called his bluff. Had Floyd wanted it and Ward backed out, you'd be correct but that never happened. Team GGG said anyone at 168 and mentioned Ward. Ward said 'let's do this', and team GGG tucked tail.

            Folks, it's about consistency. It's not about everyone going up or down in weight. It's about making a claim and then living up to it. Ward does what he says. Golovkin does not.

            The sooner you accept that this was his low point, the sooner people will stop rubbing your noses in it. It wouldn't be a big deal if you guys didn't constantly lie about it. It's actually a boring topic at this point.

            Comment


            • #46
              Holy guacamole!!!

              This is a red alert, investigators need to be on their ass now!

              Smfh

              Comment


              • #47
                Time to grab the popcorn...

                Comment


                • #48
                  Originally posted by boxingitis View Post
                  U moron anyone that makes financial sense. So u defend Ward because he didnt meet GGG at 164. U sure want GGG to lose , you want Ward to have an advantage vs GGG, like he had vs Dawson, atleast make it even. Ur hate GGG is unbelivable. 160 for mayweather but no GGG for 3 MW titles vs none at SMW fight. Ward didnt take right nor did GGG.
                  What a coward. He said including Ward.

                  Comment


                  • #49
                    Originally posted by kafkod View Post
                    It's mind boggling that the president of one of boxings sanctioning bodies can come out with a statement like that. No wonder the sport is in such a mess.
                    I do agree with that^. It was inappropriate. I'm poking fun at some of the more fervent GGG fans but I do think the comparison to Canelo is a bit off and it's not this guy's place to get into defending and/or mocking fighters. FFS, is it too much to ask to get a little impartiality from a sanctioning body??

                    Comment


                    • #50
                      Originally posted by Redd Foxx View Post
                      I do agree with that^. It was inappropriate. I'm poking fun at some of the more fervent GGG fans but I do think the comparison to Canelo is a bit off and it's not this guy's place to get into defending and/or mocking fighters. FFS, is it too much to ask to get a little impartiality from a sanctioning body??
                      I see no difference. Both ran from a hard fight.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP