Does GGG go undefeated vs a prime Kessler/Froch/Abraham...?

[Stuntman Mike]

Off the top of my head, not Froch.

i can imagine Froch nailing GGG with that big right hand with everything in it and hitting GGG full force in the face because of his lack of head movement ...would be nice to see if GGG would be able to handle it

[Stuntman Mike]

Are you dense? You just agreed that GGG was willing to fight at 168, and in the next sentence ask - why no adjustments for anyone... Are you reading what you post?

Regarding Ward - he didn't want to fight GGG at 168 right away. He just wanted agreement to fight him down the stretch. Ward can't make 168 for several years already... To anyone capable of adding 2 and 2 it was obvious, that Ward just tried to help his stablemate Cotto - to get GGG off his back. He had no intentions to fight GGG at 168.

when were Ward and Cotto stablemates ? I must be missing something

[i got the keys]

when were Ward and Cotto stablemates ? I must be missing something

He's talking about them both being under Roc Nation. His point has no merit or validity though....

[Sun_Tzu]

Kessler has the best chance, Froch behind him and Abraham loses 60 iq points in this fight.

[gauze]

in hindsight, kessler was pretty overrated. he has an excellent win in his victory over froch, but i thought froch probably deserved the nod in both fights. his other big wins include anthony mundine, markus beyer, eric lucas, and librado andrade.

outside of the froch win, his resume is worse than golovkins. however, i think he has the best chance against golovkin out of the 3 fighters listed. he has the best mix of power, speed, technical skills, and size. abraham's shell defense and fighting the last 30 seconds of the round would not cut it against golovkin, so he wouldnt even be in the discussion for me.

all of those fights would be amazing to see regardless of who would win.

[Scipio2009]

Just think Golovkin would love him and him just shelling up and GGG looping his shots around his guard.

Abraham never really looked elite to me though to be honest.

Abraham fights back from his shell, and Golovkin is still sitting open to eat some ****. You add that Abraham's never been stopped (fighting through a broken friggin' jaw to win a unanimous decision) and it would be an interesting fight, though.

[LetOutTheCage]

yes because if a fighter these days has close fights against extremely hard/elite fighters then he is overated....all three of those fighters resumes ****s on GGGs hes done nothing compared to any of them as of yet heck even abraham put his balls on the line in the super six when he never had to

if a new super six super middle tournament haooened now i doubt ggg enters

Close fights!?! They were all dominated by their opponents one time or another. Abraham made a name for himself feasting on C level German fighters. Once he took the step up and fought outside of Germany he was found wanting. He struggled against A washed up Paul Smith for goodness sake.

Kessler feasted on C level Danish fighters for most of his career, The notable names on his resume are Calzaghe, Ward and Froch. The first 2 whooped him and Calzaghe was an old fighter by then. His only really notable win is the Froch one (a limited fighter himself).

Froch is the best of the 3 but even he is a 1-dimensional, limited fighter. Having the likes of Ward, Calzaghe etc on youre resume means absolutely nothing if you get dominated by them.

[BM dnobagaV]

in hindsight, kessler was pretty overrated. he has an excellent win in his victory over froch, but i thought froch probably deserved the nod in both fights. his other big wins include anthony mundine, markus beyer, eric lucas, and librado andrade.

outside of the froch win, his resume is worse than golovkins. however, i think he has the best chance against golovkin out of the 3 fighters listed. he has the best mix of power, speed, technical skills, and size. abraham's shell defense and fighting the last 30 seconds of the round would not cut it against golovkin, so he wouldnt even be in the discussion for me.

all of those fights would be amazing to see regardless of who would win.

What the ****....

[LacedUp]

Kessler and Froch would beat his ass badly.

[LacedUp]

Close fights!?! They were all dominated by their opponents one time or another. Abraham made a name for himself feasting on C level German fighters. Once he took the step up and fought outside of Germany he was found wanting. He struggled against A washed up Paul Smith for goodness sake.

Kessler feasted on C level Danish fighters for most of his career, The notable names on his resume are Calzaghe, Ward and Froch. The first 2 whooped him and Calzaghe was an old fighter by then. His only really notable win is the Froch one (a limited fighter himself).

Froch is the best of the 3 but even he is a 1-dimensional, limited fighter. Having the likes of Ward, Calzaghe etc on youre resume means absolutely nothing if you get dominated by them.

Another clueless poster