A bit more complex than just $$ or location.. Basically Wlad wants WBA belt on the line & Hearn & Co were aware of the clause before they said fight is this close-that close nonsense.. This was not a new claim as Wlad stands to lose his rankings with WBA if he faces for IBF belt.. WBO is out of the picture for him as they have a 4-man match plan & it doe not include Wlad.. So a shot at regaining his belts means win WBA & then IBF, with IBO already agreeing to put their belt in line for any fight Wlad signs up..
Hearn knew the WBA title should have always been on the line, if WBA considers Wlad-AJ then they fight for WBA & IBF else its Wlad vs Browne/Ortiz(a possibility) for the WBA..
Hearn knew the WBA title should have always been on the line, if WBA considers Wlad-AJ then they fight for WBA & IBF else its Wlad vs Browne/Ortiz(a possibility) for the WBA..
Comment