Who will history rank higher Hopkins/Mayweather/Pacquiao

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • daggum
    All time great
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Feb 2008
    • 43929
    • 4,771
    • 3
    • 166,270

    #51
    Originally posted by Fangedgrowl
    Tarver was as old as Roy dude. Tarver also we don't know or not was juicing when he beat Roy. So we can't say. But that is Hopkins best win, True or Not?
    tarver turned pro when he was 28 and was on the best run of his career. how could he not be prime? so you are saying he didn't have a prime?

    Comment

    • i got the keys
      Interim Champion
      Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
      • Jul 2016
      • 756
      • 38
      • 79
      • 7,382

      #52
      Originally posted by bigdramashow
      As the poll reflects, 1) mayweather, 2) pacquiao. Bernard is lightyears behind them two
      We know you don't know anything about boxing....

      Comment

      • The Big Dunn
        Undisputed Champion
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Sep 2009
        • 70651
        • 10,200
        • 8,380
        • 287,568

        #53
        Originally posted by don larryx
        depends on who is doing the ranking..all lists will be different depending on who is doing the ranking and what they prefer
        Agree with this.

        objective historians/media/journalists almost always have Floyd ahead of Bhop and Manny. I don't see what either of the 3 have done recently to change this.
        Last edited by The Big Dunn; 10-18-2016, 12:54 PM.

        Comment

        • boliodogs
          Undisputed Champion
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • May 2008
          • 33358
          • 824
          • 1,782
          • 309,589

          #54
          Mayweather because he never lost a fight and made more money and became more famous than either Hopkins or Pacquiao. Pacquiao was and is very famous but I think Mayweather is even more famous. When they fought Mayweather got payed more money than Pacquiao and he won the fight even though he was the older boxer.

          Comment

          • Madison Boxing
            Banned
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Jul 2015
            • 35364
            • 6,455
            • 3,367
            • 190,590

            #55
            Originally posted by i got the keys
            We know you don't know anything about boxing....
            well bernards got 1 vote out of 26 so im not too far wrong

            Comment

            • i got the keys
              Interim Champion
              Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
              • Jul 2016
              • 756
              • 38
              • 79
              • 7,382

              #56
              Originally posted by bigdramashow
              well bernards got 1 vote out of 26 so im not too far wrong

              Comment

              • therealpugilist
                Undisputed Champion
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • May 2012
                • 14612
                • 561
                • 4
                • 45,735

                #57
                Originally posted by Sterling Archer



                YOU

                ARE

                A

                FLOIDS INFESTED FLOWMOESEXUAL.




                know your place boy.
                insults indicate a weak argument for you position


                major Loss...fail/

                you cant dispute a thing i said legitimately

                take it like a man, baby boy...you dont know shyt about boxing

                Comment

                • elfag
                  Alpha fäggot
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Jan 2008
                  • 15667
                  • 3,501
                  • 302
                  • 65,929

                  #58
                  Originally posted by Sterling Archer
                  i prefer great fights vs great prime opposition.

                  that means pacquiao.


                  if you prefer exquisite spoiling tactics, you go with bernard.

                  floyd DESPITE not leaving great exciting tapes vs great IN PRIME opposition, at least left great tapes for defensive teaching....

                  resume wise,

                  bernard is obviously behind both floyd and manny ATG rankings wise....

                  now, who ranks higher?

                  Floyd or Manny?

                  If you are looking for a pc answer its floyd with the "perfect" record...

                  If you want the real answer its pacquiao.

                  Pacquiao went up the hard way unlike floyd who was babied by top rank,

                  Pacquiao had to go through prime MAB, MORALES, and Marquez just to get babied by top rank....

                  Floyd has always been protected from the day he was borne... borne to a pro boxing family, in the most powerful and richest nation on earth....

                  Pacquiao has great in prime opposition along with leaving us great exciting legendary fights vs legendary prime opposition.

                  Floyd left us boring tapes vs pat prime opposition......


                  At least when roy jones jr. was king and fought bums, he knocked bums out and put on a show....


                  Floyd fights past prime bums and cant even put on a show. He fights them like he's fighting prime tommy hearns.....



                  lol at the bias. Floyd being the first to beat a cuban in 20 years and then being cheated out of the gold was being babied?

                  And he grew up rich? yeah because shooting your relatives while theyre holding a baby and going to prison for 5 years for drug trafficking is something rich families do. A contender and a belt holder from the 80s were insanely rich.

                  Comment

                  • daggum
                    All time great
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Feb 2008
                    • 43929
                    • 4,771
                    • 3
                    • 166,270

                    #59
                    Originally posted by The Big Dunn
                    Agree with this.

                    objective historians/media/journalists almost always have Floyd ahead of Bhop and Manny. I don't see what either of the 3 have done recently to change this.
                    pac recently beat floyd and bradley. what's wrong with that? i know floyd was old and he had already beaten bradley but they were 2 of the best.

                    Comment

                    • IronDanHamza
                      BoxingScene Icon
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Oct 2009
                      • 50001
                      • 5,149
                      • 270
                      • 104,043

                      #60
                      Originally posted by daggum
                      pac recently beat floyd and bradley. what's wrong with that? i know floyd was old and he had already beaten bradley but they were 2 of the best.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP