Does Jacobs drop GGG with this shot?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Doctor_Tenma
    Monster
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Apr 2009
    • 33313
    • 1,327
    • 1,249
    • 58,127

    #81
    Originally posted by Kigali
    This troll is lost as a lamb.
    Why don't you explain yourself better rather than get all emotional? Jacobs doesn't hurt guys with his straight right hand, it's more looping.

    Comment

    • Kigali
      Banned
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Jun 2016
      • 17128
      • 263
      • 0
      • 19,441

      #82
      Originally posted by Doctor_Tenma
      Why don't you explain yourself better rather than get all emotional? Jacobs doesn't hurt guys with his straight right hand, it's more looping.
      you must have been an emotional wreck when you said Brook is a better fighter than Jacobs...lol

      Comment

      • Doctor_Tenma
        Monster
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Apr 2009
        • 33313
        • 1,327
        • 1,249
        • 58,127

        #83
        Originally posted by Kigali
        you must have been an emotional wreck when you said Brook is a better fighter than Jacobs...lol
        He is, don't see how that's even debatable. I think your the only poster on this forum that thinks otherwise. Other than the physical tools to compete at 160 Jacobs doesn't have anything over Brook, especially not mentally.

        Jacobs isn't even confident in his own abilities, why you think he's so tight and tentative in the ring?

        Comment

        • Mequetrefe
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Oct 2016
          • 1274
          • 56
          • 0
          • 14,670

          #84
          Jacobs can't drop GGG with that shot. "Can't". from 160-175, the only one I see giving him problems is maybe Kovalev and even he probably cant. Andre Ward can't beat him also.

          Comment

          • Kigali
            Banned
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Jun 2016
            • 17128
            • 263
            • 0
            • 19,441

            #85
            Originally posted by Doctor_Tenma
            He is, don't see how that's even debatable. I think your the only poster on this forum that thinks otherwise. Other than the physical tools to compete at 160 Jacobs doesn't have anything over Brook, especially not mentally.

            Jacobs isn't even confident in his own abilities, why you think he's so tight and tentative in the ring?
            What's not debatable is that Jacobs is far and away better than Kel Brook.

            Danny is tentative in the ring?

            Comment

            • Doctor_Tenma
              Monster
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Apr 2009
              • 33313
              • 1,327
              • 1,249
              • 58,127

              #86
              Originally posted by Kigali
              What's not debatable is that Jacobs is far and away better than Kel Brook.

              Danny is tentative in the ring?

              Make a poll, since you strongly feel otherwise. Go ahead, please. Make sure it's a public poll.

              Comment

              • Sparked_26
                Undisputed Champion
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Jul 2012
                • 15647
                • 1,019
                • 135
                • 93,128

                #87
                Originally posted by Kigali
                What's not debatable is that Jacobs is far and away better than Kel Brook.

                Danny is tentative in the ring?

                Are you Danny Jacobs' Mum?

                Comment

                Working...
                TOP