Comments Thread For: Klitschko vs. Joshua in Jeopardy Over WBA World Title

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BIGPOPPAPUMP
    Franchise Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Sep 2003
    • 46539
    • 2,259
    • 334
    • 5,493,285

    #1

    Comments Thread For: Klitschko vs. Joshua in Jeopardy Over WBA World Title

    According to promoter Eddie Hearn of Matchroom Sport, the very anticipated heavyweight showdown - between IBF champion Anthony Joshua and former division ruler Wladimir Klitschko - is in jeopardy over the WBA world title.

    [Click Here To Read More]
  • Karoriori
    Interim Champion
    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
    • Sep 2016
    • 563
    • 21
    • 0
    • 7,245

    #2
    Not happening. Had to laugh when i heard the fights likely to go ahead they just needed to agree on paperwork.

    Comment

    • Ray*
      Be safe!!!
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Jul 2005
      • 44867
      • 1,654
      • 1,608
      • 558,890

      #3
      Hmmmmm, just like i thought. Someone quoted me yesterday regarding this.

      Comment

      • Szef
        Face of Boxing
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Feb 2012
        • 15016
        • 2,488
        • 1,554
        • 253,303

        #4
        it sounded too good to be true anyway.

        Comment

        • Ray*
          Be safe!!!
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Jul 2005
          • 44867
          • 1,654
          • 1,608
          • 558,890

          #5
          I have seen this before many atimes, the Fwank warren era when he would claim someone is fighting his lead fighter, and then blam they can't make the fight because this happened. Hearn is NOT fooling me.

          Comment

          • LacedUp
            Still Smokin'
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Oct 2009
            • 29171
            • 781
            • 381
            • 132,163

            #6
            The WBA should definitely sanction this fight with Ortiz given a mandatory shot or something.

            I mean, what a joke it would be if instead it'd be something like Ortiz/Scott vs Haye/Browne or some crap.

            Comment

            • LacedUp
              Still Smokin'
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Oct 2009
              • 29171
              • 781
              • 381
              • 132,163

              #7
              Originally posted by Ray*
              I have seen this before many atimes, the Fwank warren era when he would claim someone is fighting his lead fighter, and then blam they can't make the fight because this happened. Hearn is NOT fooling me.
              To be fair, he did say it all the way from the beginning.

              Comment

              • Ray*
                Be safe!!!
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Jul 2005
                • 44867
                • 1,654
                • 1,608
                • 558,890

                #8
                Originally posted by LacedUp
                To be fair, he did say it all the way from the beginning.
                Am not even shocked or upset, I dont think AJ should be taking this fight now anyways.

                Comment

                • TheCleaner
                  Interim Champion
                  Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                  • Sep 2014
                  • 506
                  • 15
                  • 20
                  • 10,822

                  #9
                  in all fairness, wlads rematch clause is put there so he can have a shot of winning his belts back.. obviously he cant now fight fury, but hes probs not going to fight joshua just for only the IBF belt. I find hearn to be pretty open about these things, he's totally honest about %'s and how he puts on shows, watch some of his in depth iFL interviews.

                  Comment

                  • Robbie Barrett
                    Banned
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Nov 2013
                    • 40891
                    • 2,779
                    • 667
                    • 570,921

                    #10
                    Why would Klitschko cancel the fight if there's no WBA title? Doesn't make sense, there's still the IBF title.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP