-
-
Let's get it right:
Nobody is saying that the former greats were unbeatable.
It's you and Headshots who's saying they couldn't have beaten GG because they lost and he hasn't.
That's what's happening here.
And when someone puts forward a name you're not familiar with, you scurry off to boxrec to try and shoot it down.Last edited by robertzimmerman; 10-17-2016, 05:53 PM.Comment
-
Another nothing post.
I gave you plenty of logic regarding Roy's fight with Glen Johnson.
I also presented you with facts and asked you questions.
Go and watch Roy at MW when he was in his early 20's.
Go and watch him at LHW when he was in his mid 30's.
They were different fighters altogether.
Roy's loss to Glen has no bearing on a fantasy fight with GG at MW.
None whatsoever.
Glen was stronger than Roy and fights nothing like GG. He also has 75" reach.
GG wasn't as big as Roy at MW, and the version of Roy who fought at MW, was in his prime and not faded.
Do you understand?
It's a completely pointless comparison.Comment
-
Bigdramashow and headshots both ducked my question multiple times.
end thread.Comment
-
There's nothing wrong with you holding an opinion, especially if it's objective and logical.
If you think GG would have beaten Ray, that's cool. But you have to be willing to respect other people's opinions if they are also objective and logical. But you don't do that.
Nunn is a prime example. Someone put it to you that Nunn COULD have beaten GG. But instead of giving logical reasons as to why you don't agree, you scoffed at the notion and just noted that he'd lost to Little. You're not interested in the fact that Nunn was a slick southpaw with a huge reach advantage, you're only interested in who he lost to.
You did the exact same thing to Toney and Eubank.
Despite GG being unbeaten, yes, you can logically present theories of who from the past could have beaten him.
Analysing a fighter's skill set and looking at the clash of styles, is much better than looking at results on boxrec. For example: Yes, Eubank lost to Collins when he was faded at SMW. But how does that relate to a fantasy fight with GG at MW?
While it may be factual to note the losses of these former greats, most of the time those facts aren't really that relevant.
Forget the likes of Roy losing to Glen Johnson at LHW, and look at the attributes that he had at MW. Kell Brook has just had GG's head bouncing all over the place at times, even though he wasn't hurting him. That tells us that although GG is a great fighter, he's also very easy to hit, and he has little head movement and he marks up. A guy like Roy would have had a birthday in there with a 5" reach advantage and his insane hand speed. Especially as he also possessed: great timing, great accuracy, great variation, and one punch knockout power in either hand.Last edited by robertzimmerman; 10-17-2016, 06:05 PM.Comment
-
Yeah, that's exactly what's happening.
These clowns are dismissing every fighter you put to them by looking on boxrec and repeatedly declaring that GG's unbeaten.
It's completely pointless.
Who makes a thread asking who could have beaten him, but then point blank refuses to take on board anyone's opinion?
It's ******ed.Last edited by robertzimmerman; 10-17-2016, 06:06 PM.Comment
-
Sven Ottke ATGComment
Tweet
Comment