Name a 160 fighter in history that could beat GGG?

[HeadShots]

You lose fights when you fight great fighters. You lose fights when you fight 20+ times a year.

Stop being dense.

No one who knows boxing is impressed with an undefeated record.

they lost to absolute bums. not great fighters. bums.

[HeadShots]

you've got to be ****ting me?

One of his losses was he was 8-0 to a 16-0 then he lost to a 37-9 when he was only 13-1 and then a few fights later lost to 2-0.... after that he hasn't lost a fight in almost 100 bouts while stepping up the competition each time. He had 100 fights.... lost 3 before his 20th fight... how in the world he wasn't green is beyond me.

did GGG lose a fight when he was 8-0?


just LMAO @ the amount of woe is him excuses. what a ****ing cuckold.

[Madison Boxing]

did GGG lose a fight when he was 8-0?


just LMAO @ the amount of woe is him excuses. what a ****ing cuckold.

i made the point earlier but it got ignored. Can you imagine their reaction if GGG had slipped up aginst someone like wade lol. they would certainly not be making out it was a fluke one off loss and that all good fighters can have an off night, They would be breaking their keyboards typing 'hype job' 'exposed'. Damn, they already say ouma exposed golovkin and that means golovkins not very good. Yet they give all these other guys a pass for lsoing to complete bums, they write it off completely if it was fairly early in their career.

[robertzimmerman]

You know, as much as you like your favorite boxer, you can't go and disrespect every great to prove your point, that shows that you are either trolling or that you are a fanboy.

Correct. But they're not even proving any points.

They're just jokers.

[Tom Cruise]

they lost to absolute bums. not great fighters. bums.

It happens when you fight that often

Most the time the losses werent to bums though. Not the losses in their primes anyways. Not all fighters will be remembered 30-40-50 years after they were active. Doesnt mean they are bums

[sunny31]

and to all you idiots piping up. I highly highly highly doubt youve watched significant number of fights of these old timers you are bringing up. I can form opinions from reading records. Do i need to watch all 39 fights of someone who was 27-12 to say that he probably isnt going to beat golovkin? Its called logic ffs. Its like me saying oh some guy who was 30-15 from the 60s would beat mayweather, you all laughing, then me saying oh well youve never seen this guy fight, so how the **** do you know?!
Just easy for you all to try and make me look ****** 'oh haha your a noob you never watched (insert some random guy from the 50's here) fight'. Makes me laugh that you say i use boxrec and then you all start quoting some real detailed **** about some obscure fights from 50 years ago, as if thats come fresh from your memory.

Caros Monzon is generally considered one of the best 2-3 middleweights of all time on most respectable lists and you by your own admission 'don't know much about him'. Your favourite fighter is GGG (a middleweight), and you have made a thread about who could have beaten him in history.

When you are presented facts and judgements from people who have seen both fighters, INEXPLICABLY, you don't actually go watch said fighter, you continue arguing on here by trying to break down his/their record, without any knowledge of these opponents or level of competition.

Do you have any idea how ignorant you come across?

You are literally too much idiot for me to handle, and I've come across them all! LOL - I'm done.

[Madison Boxing]

and i think a lot of you who have just joined in havent seen the crap that was posted earlier on. Fair enough imo, can make a case for someone like monzon beating golovkin, do i agree, im not sure but there is a case there. Same with fighters like toney, roy jones, hagler- a case can be made. But some of the names put up at the start of the thread were ****ing ridiculous, 27-12 guys, people like that. Thats what im saying is ridiculous

[Kigali]

Caros Monzon is generally considered one of the best 2-3 middleweights of all time on most respectable lists and you by your own admission 'don't know much about him'. Your favourite fighter is GGG (a middleweight), and you have made a thread about who could have beaten him in history.

When you are presented facts and judgements from people who have seen both fighters, INEXPLICABLY, you don't actually go watch said fighter, you continue arguing on here by trying to break down his/their record, without any knowledge of these opponents or level of competition.

Do you have any idea how ignorant you come across?

You are literally too much idiot for me to handle, and I've come across them all! LOL - I'm done.

He's more of a b*tch than an idiot.

[Tom Cruise]

Whats the point of even talking about this subject when you guys have admitted you cba to watch the fighters we are talking about?

[HeadShots]

ggg beats rjj 10/10 times