Name a 160 fighter in history that could beat GGG?

[Mr.MojoRisin']

mate i'd give up arguing with them, i cant be bothered to respond to their points anymore. Its just nonsensical rubbish they are talking, these guys think someone who is 27-12 beats golovkin, thats what you are dealing with. They cant be reasoned with. They pluck the names of fighters who will beat golovkin out of their arse, and try and justify it with the most ****** reasons. Just a sad jealous bunch really, get their kicks from discrediting someones achievements, how tragic.

You and HeadShots both ducked my question several times. I will ask you once again to name an atg fighter that GGG showed great inside fighting skills against. Of any weight in a pro fight.

[HeadShots]

If they are objectively rating Golovkin then they must think Mayweather is the greatest super featherweight, lightweight, lightwelterweight, and welterweight to ever live as well as Marciano being the greatest Heavyweight to ever live.

Mayweather is certainly making the case for being TBE. HOWEVER, GGG is even a level above him in terms of dominance of a weight class.

how many defenses did mayweather have at those weights? same with marciano. how many defenses does he have of his title?



Also let's not forget, Mayweather has had close fights that could've easily gone the other way if it wasn't a hometown decision. Castillo and Maidana in particular. Maidana had to wear a glove of Mayweather's choice before he could fight and he arguably beat him.

so there is a blueprint to beating Mayweather from the Castillo fight, Maidana fight and his ducking of Margarito. You have to smother Mayweather's work.






There is simply no such fight in GGG's entire career. The only one people hold onto is Ouma who GGG completely destroyed. 2.5 years of his career gone.

[robertzimmerman]

what would you know about boxing history? you only started watching boxing in 2014 lol

What the **** do you know?

You're a boxrec warrior who debates on stats.

You're an insignificant joker.

[Mr.MojoRisin']

Mayweather is certainly making the case for being TBE. HOWEVER, GGG is even a level above him in terms of dominance of a weight class.

how many defenses did mayweather have at those weights? same with marciano. how many defenses does he have of his title?



Also let's not forget, Mayweather has had close fights that could've easily gone the other way if it wasn't a hometown decision. Castillo and Maidana in particular. Maidana had to wear a glove of Mayweather's choice before he could fight and he arguably beat him.

so there is a blueprint to beating Mayweather from the Castillo fight, Maidana fight and his ducking of Margarito. You have to smother Mayweather's work.






There is simply no such fight in GGG's entire career. The only one people hold onto is Ouma who GGG completely destroyed. 2.5 years of his career gone.

You ducked my other post again! Mother****er!

To answer the question you originally asked: Briscoe

Now answer mine you ****ing *****.

[just the facts]

what would you know about boxing history? you only started watching boxing in 2014 lol

I've been a serious boxing fan since the 70's, so the johnny come lately is you, idiot.

[Madison Boxing]

I've been a serious boxing fan since the 70's, so the johnny come lately is you, idiot.

watching the rumble in the jungle and the odd mayweather fight does not make you a hardcore fan

[robertzimmerman]

Glen Johnson is older than Roy with 6 more losses than roy.

if you are going to use the shopworn excuse, it applies to Johnson more than it applies to roy who only had 1 loss you idiot.

Johnson is also older than Roy. just LMAO how many times are you going to argue the same points?


This is like when Holyfield fought Tyson. it has nothing to do with age and damage... holyfield is older and got a lot more damage thru those wars with Bowe.

it had everything to do with style. Roy is an ambush fighter who needs space to operate. when you shove him into a corner, he's toast. he's always had this flaw. on top of his absolutely glass chin. he just never fought the seek and destroy fighters that could've chased him down. He ducked Gman like the plague.

roy was only 35. same age as GGG (still on top of his game).


it only goes to prove GGG > Roy


heads up.

longevity.

skills.

Oh my!

Where do I begin with this nonsense?


Glen is the exact same age as Roy. But So what?

Yes, GG at 34 is still at the top of his game. Again, so what?


Age and ring age are 2 completely different things, and everyone's circumstances are different.

GG hasn't fought 50 plus pro fights.

He hasn't gone up multiple divisions and then dropped back quickly like Roy did.

What point are you trying to make?

Again, fighters age differently at different stages.


Of course Roy was shopworn against Glen.

What are you saying? That Roy was prime, and that Glen beat him just because he was a better fighter?

Please!

Nobody thinks that Glen would have beaten Roy pre-Ruiz.

Again, go and find me just one person.


So because Roy was shopworn at 35, it meant that Glen had to be because he was the same age?

Get real.

Glen went on to lose to Clinton Woods after he'd beaten Roy.

Roy was simply finished as a top level fighter after the Ruiz fight.

He struggled with Tarver in the first fight and was iced in the rematch, before fighting Glen less than 3 months later.


I mean, I know you're ignorant, but even you can't serious believe that Glen would always have beaten Roy.

He bullied Roy because Roy had just been iced and he was gun shy.

There's various accounts of Roy's mindset and his health going into the fight, including the ringside doctor who said Roy was out cold for so long because he was so dehydrated.

The version of Roy who fought Thomas Tate at MW, 10 years earlier, was a completely different fighter.

You are just reaching.


How did he duck Gerald like the plague?


Regarding Mike and Evander, that was an awesome win by Evander. But he had more left than Mike.

Mike was just fighting purely for money at that point.


What about Mike's fight against Lennox?

Lennox was older than Mike.

But I guess I'm not allowed to say that Mike was more faded?

[just the facts]

watching the rumble in the jungle and the odd mayweather fight does not make you a hardcore fan

I'm more of a hardcore fan than you will ever be. Again, you're just a cheerleader. I suspect complete with pompoms and a sexy little skirt

[JACK1190]

Golovkin fans are the new ******ed Pacquiao fans.

[-MAKAVELLI-]

Howard Eastman and Kelly Pavlik