Name a 160 fighter in history that could beat GGG?

[HeadShots]

the single mother offsprings so far have resorted to....

1. turd slinging

2. make up complete lies

3. posting irrelevant footage





is it any wonder? I mean.... i wish I was making this up.

[Squ□redCircle34]

Holy shot this thread is one of the worst I have ever witnessed in history!

Never mind the racial verbiage, but you lot aren't making GGG look anymore favorable with other fellow fans of the sport!

I remember I once said the end of times is coming when I agree with Floyd Mayweather more than once and that just happened!

[CaneloMaidana]

All beat her.

[Scipio2009]

Im struggling to think of one who i would pick against him with any confidence. Hagler would be pretty much 50/50 i think, but only way i could clearly see him losing is against a bigger man at a higher weight.
The guy has left a trail of destruction in the middleweight division that hasnt been seen before, greatness is happening in front of our eyes, fighters are running for cover to avoid fighting him, and all you guys can do is ***** and moan!!! Its pathetic!!!!
And if you are going to say someone can beat him, please provide a good explanation rather than just talking crap, looking for intelligent boxing discussion...

Roy Jones Jr, Bernard Hopkins, and James Toney all beat the ever-loving dog**** out of Golovkin. And that's without much thought

[TOBYLEE1]

very long time.


here i'll logically break things down for you. The Olympics, old records do not stand. Because athletes get better, nutrition get better, talent pool becomes bigger. this is a simple fact.

back in the 70's, boxing was only an american sport(north and south). now it's a global sport with much more amateur prospects from Europe, Asia etc. This is a fact.

American boxing prospects has grown as well because the same demographics like blacks and latinos have grown in #'s. They are still broke too, so it's not like they are the ***s or Italians who are going to school to work now. Blacks are still pursuing athletics and fighting in the streets) except with better nutrition now and better skills due to better film footage to study.


the MW greats.


Hagler lost to Willie Monroe caliber of fighters in his prime. this is a fact. GGG plays with that level of talent.

Monzon lost to and drew with absolute bums. GGG doesn't do that.




2 established facts of history.



worse athletes. smaller talent pool to draw from.


all those MW greats lost to bums in their primes.





GGG is the result of the largest talent pool without any losses. Period. He is the heads on favorite against anybody in MW history.

Do you actually know that there were more boxers in the past than at this moment?

Also do you just throw away the same day weigh in, 15 round fights, less title, less weight classes, etc. An era when a contender was actually somebody. Those guys had loses in their careers because you had to fight everybody and frequently.

You have a poor analysis of the sport and you are so wrong with Hagler.

[Mr.MojoRisin']

as proven already, you're an emotional liar.

you are so emotionally driven to win an argument, you are making things up out of thin air like a female.

Name one thing I said which was made up.

[Mr.MojoRisin']

i'm still trying to get to the bottom of why a grown man would make up lies for another man he's never met before.

it's definitely troubling.

psychological disorder me thinks.

You're projecting.

[Mr.MojoRisin']

Yeah, cause there isn't one at 160 who would

In other words you don't know **** about boxing.

[Larry the boss]

you just simply do not know how to read, do you?

is this the fight we are talking about?

I just posted a championship fight

[Mr.MojoRisin']

he would be a bum today.

Yes, because Danny Jacobs, Chris Eubank Jr, and Billy Joe Saunders are such killers.