Name a 160 fighter in history that could beat GGG?

[Madison Boxing]

I suspect that also..........

why would i create an alt with exactly the same views that i have on this account? makes no sense lol

[Mr.MojoRisin']

lol you sound like a spoilt child whos upset someones got a difference of opinion.And what relevance has your question got? Hes not an inside fighter, but hes never been bullied on the inside to my knowledge?Bemused as to why you think that is some thread ending question, different fighters have different styles. DOnt think roy jones was known too much for his inside fighting either.

Because you said he is a great inside fighter and sited the Ouma fight as evidence.

GGG got beat up on the inside by Kell Brook.

GGG never stepped in the ring with an atg fighter and gets knocked out by all of the guys I mentioned in my first post. You're tied with Jugggynutz as the worst poster on this website. **** around and get put on a list type ****.

[Madison Boxing]

Because you said he is a great inside fighter and sited the Ouma fight as evidence.

GGG got beat up on the inside by Kell Brook.

GGG never stepped in the ring with an atg fighter and gets knocked out by all of the guys I mentioned in my first post. You're tied with Jugggynutz as the worst poster on this website. **** around and get put on a list type ****.

did he really get beat up lol? Brook landed a couple of nice combos and GGG (fighting on the inside for msot of it) broke his eyesocket and has potentially seriously affected brooks career. He also beat him up badly enough toget towel thrown in round 5. and i dont care lol. you dont have to spell it out for me tht you dont like my posts, pretty clear. And did i say that? no. Might be getting me mixed up with headshots.

[i got the keys]

no but i bet a lot of them werent elite fighters. Fighters in the old days got more than their fair share of soft touches. And im not slating armstrong before you trolls start twisting my words lol

200 fights and 190 of them were probably against bums who didnt train lol

You said this in your other thread when I mentioned Hammerin Hank having over 200 fights....

[Mr.MojoRisin']

did he really get beat up lol? Brook landed a couple of nice combos and GGG (fighting on the inside for msot of it) broke his eyesocket and has potentially seriously affected brooks career. He also beat him up badly enough toget towel thrown in round 5. and i dont care lol. you dont have to spell it out for me tht you dont like my posts, pretty clear. And did i say that? no. Might be getting me mixed up with headshots.

Boy you are headshots lmfao

We all have seen the fight, there are plenty of gifs of GGG getting touched up by Brook and if any fighter that I listed landed those punches then GGG goes to sleep. His defense is garbage. No fighter lets themselves get hit whether or not they have a good chin. Hagler had a better chin than GGG and still used defense. It isn't only about not getting knocked out, when they land punches they score points. Malignaggi wouldn't have made it this far if guys just walked right through his punches.

[just the facts]

why would i create an alt with exactly the same views that i have on this account? makes no sense lol

Same reason you post that the one fighter throughout history that was closest to being perfect is Ricky Hatton.

Same reason you post that you'd favor g string (with ZERO quality wins) over every other MW throughout history.

You're an IDIOT!

[Madison Boxing]

You said this in your other thread when I mentioned Hammerin Hank having over 200 fights....

that was meant more of as an eaggerated joke. Sounds like armstrong was a great fighter, one of best of all time. Maybe i havent communicated it clearly enough but im not saying fighters from the past suck. Of course they dont What im mainly saying is that someof them are heavily exaggerated in terms of how good they are. Im getting serious heat fo this thread but the main thing ive been arguing is that some guy who was 27-12 would not beat GGG. You ask most people in the real world if someone who was 27-12 would beat golovkin and they'd point and laugh lol. We could go back and forth on this forever but i really dont see how im the crazy one for saying that

[Madison Boxing]

Same reason you post that the one fighter throughout history that was closest to being perfect is Ricky Hatton.

Same reason you post that you'd favor g string (with ZERO quality wins) over every other MW throughout history.

You're an IDIOT!

jesus christ dont tell me you took that seriously. You probably thought i was serious when i said haye v harrison was the best value money for ppv i ever bought.

[i got the keys]

no but i bet a lot of them werent elite fighters. Fighters in the old days got more than their fair share of soft touches. And im not slating armstrong before you trolls start twisting my words lol

that was meant more of as an eaggerated joke. Sounds like armstrong was a great fighter, one of best of all time. Maybe i havent communicated it clearly enough but im not saying fighters from the past suck. Of course they dont What im mainly saying is that someof them are heavily exaggerated in terms of how good they are. Im getting serious heat fo this thread but the main thing ive been arguing is that some guy who was 27-12 would not beat GGG. You ask most people in the real world if someone who was 27-12 would beat golovkin and they'd point and laugh lol. We could go back and forth on this forever but i really dont see how im the crazy one for saying that

You can't let the record fool you. THere are guys 25-0 or 30-0 that wouldn't beat GGG. The record doesn't necessarily mean they can't best a top dog on any given day. Ask Iran Barkley, Glen Johnson, Randall Bailey...ect....

I understand you may not know any of them...haha...

[Madison Boxing]

Boy you are headshots lmfao

We all have seen the fight, there are plenty of gifs of GGG getting touched up by Brook and if any fighter that I listed landed those punches then GGG goes to sleep. His defense is garbage. No fighter lets themselves get hit whether or not they have a good chin. Hagler had a better chin than GGG and still used defense. It isn't only about not getting knocked out, when they land punches they score points. Malignaggi wouldn't have made it this far if guys just walked right through his punches.

he didnt 'let himself get hit' but he wasnt as defnse conscious as in other fights. WHy did he need to be? The guy couldnt hurt him and with his brawling tactics he got him out of there in 5 rounds. Yeah ive seen the GIFS lol, people got so excited cause a world class wleterweight managed to land some good combos.