Originally posted by Koba-Grozny
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Canelo's Trainer: Three Fights For 2017, Maybe First at 158
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Bjl12 View PostDespite all the CW fights he is Top 10 in BOXING for resumes. Top 10 in ALL OF BOXING for resumes. Aside from like Klit, Ward, or Pac his resume is strong as hell...and none of his fights were weight-dependent (and this is obviously discluding Floyd, BHop, RJJ, JMM, Mosley, Cotto, etc.).
So
Secondly, even with that built in advantage, Canelo's resume sucks. He lost 10 rounds to Floyd. Is that supposed to be a notch on his resume? Because he was willing to fight Floyd? Well I guess Robert Guerrero has the best resume in boxing too because he was willing to face not just Floyd, but Thurman, etc. It's not like GGG wouldn't be just as willing to fight Floyd and probably not lose 10+ rounds either.
Canelo fought Trout and Lara even. Those were pick-em fights. Trout hasn't proven himself an elite fighter except for that one Cotto win, which maybe Cotto was not as his best. It was post-Margarito/Pacquiao, pre-Roach Cotto. Fighters like Chocolatito get knocked for moving up in weight and winning a fight 8-4 against Cuadras, but Canelo is supposed to get credit "beating" smaller men 6-6?
Who else has he beat? Beating Cotto at 155 when Cotto was just about to go down to fight Marquez at 150? That proves he's still a welter/jr middle. Cotto is also an older 35 with lots of wear and tear. That fight was also less than a dominating performance.
So yes, Canelo has some nice names on his resume, just like Pacquiao and Mayweather were able to get old Mosley to fight them because of their drawing power, but that doesn't mean **** honestly. And out of those four names, one he got dominated, and two he fought to what should have been draws, and the third he won 7-5 or 8-4. It's the most overrated resumé in boxing.
Comment
-
Makes total sense. Golovkin came in at 158.9 for the Brook fight and he looked lime death....so 158 sounds about right. tough on though is if Alvarez fights Golovkin for all the belts they have to do a day of weigh in with a limit of 10 pounds...may see Alvarez struggle.
Comment
-
Originally posted by bambam182 View Postit would have gone to pursie bid because GGG wouldnt have accepted the terms. idiot.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by bambam182 View PostROFL GGG terms? he isnt the A side. GGG does what canelo wants him to.))
Last edited by MantisToboggan; 10-15-2016, 11:17 AM.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Boxing Logic View PostFirst of all judging who has a better resume in this era in useless except for the top 3-4 guys because mostly it's like comparing dog**** to bull****. 95% of the boxers are ducking so very few develop good resumes except for the cash cows who have a huge advantage in that regard because they can take their pick of everyone who wants to fight them. For example Canelo had the option to fight Lara because Lara wanted that fight so bad, he came to Canelo's fight and interrupted the press conference. GGG does not have the same options because Lara just talks about GGG but won't come to the press conference or fight on HBO.
Secondly, even with that built in advantage, Canelo's resume sucks. He lost 10 rounds to Floyd. Is that supposed to be a notch on his resume? Because he was willing to fight Floyd? Well I guess Robert Guerrero has the best resume in boxing too because he was willing to face not just Floyd, but Thurman, etc. It's not like GGG wouldn't be just as willing to fight Floyd and probably not lose 10+ rounds either.
Canelo fought Trout and Lara even. Those were pick-em fights. Trout hasn't proven himself an elite fighter except for that one Cotto win, which maybe Cotto was not as his best. It was post-Margarito/Pacquiao, pre-Roach Cotto. Fighters like Chocolatito get knocked for moving up in weight and winning a fight 8-4 against Cuadras, but Canelo is supposed to get credit "beating" smaller men 6-6?
Who else has he beat? Beating Cotto at 155 when Cotto was just about to go down to fight Marquez at 150? That proves he's still a welter/jr middle. Cotto is also an older 35 with lots of wear and tear. That fight was also less than a dominating performance.
So yes, Canelo has some nice names on his resume, just like Pacquiao and Mayweather were able to get old Mosley to fight them because of their drawing power, but that doesn't mean **** honestly. And out of those four names, one he got dominated, and two he fought to what should have been draws, and the third he won 7-5 or 8-4. It's the most overrated resumé in boxing.
Comment
Comment