Golovkin has quietly taken on the same level of opposition as DSG this year.
Collapse
-
-
I can only see where the fighters are ranked now. There is no way I know to go back to when Garcia fought him to see where Guererro was ranked then. I do remember him being ranked well down in the 20s. He had his ass soundly kicked by Thurman not that long before he fought Garcia. You remember Thurman, that champion Garcia is afraid to fight. Middleweight is as strong as any other weight class. It's the GGG haters who say it's so weak to try to discredit his middleweight wins. If Garcia was a middleweight he would duck GGG the same way he ducks Thurman now.Comment
-
-
Guerrero also received a very disputable decision against Aaron Martinez before Garcia. He was almost knocked out cold in that fight, too. He went to war with Kamegai before Thurman. He lost to Peralta after Garcia.I can only see where the fighters are ranked now. There is no way I know to go back to when Garcia fought him to see where Guererro was ranked then. I do remember him being ranked well down in the 20s. He had his ass soundly kicked by Thurman not that long before he fought Garcia. You remember Thurman, that champion Garcia is afraid to fight. Middleweight is as strong as any other weight class. It's the GGG haters who say it's so weak to try to discredit his middleweight wins. If Garcia was a middleweight he would duck GGG the same way he ducks Thurman now.
I like Guerrero, but he was nowhere near a top 10 fighter when Garcia fought him, and Garcia really shouldn't get much credit for going to war with him.Comment
-
There must be some kind of NSB rule where when you post a thread about GGG you have to bring up in the thread somewhere that Golovkin's team said 4 years ago they would fight anybody from 154-168.
Even if the guy consistently makes efforts to try to unify 160.
It's literally in every single thread like this.
LOL.Comment
-
The point is Guerrero has been at Welterweight for almost half a decade now,aging or not he fought in Danny's division and had challenged for two titles already in the division. Brook was a decent welterweight,but from his level of opposition it would be impossible to make the claim that he was the best. Also lol at him being one the best you've ever seen. you reach any further you're going to be needing a new arm.
i called him one of the biggest. which he is. you skipped three letters
.
lol at you being hardly capable of reading.
brook beat porter more convincingly than thurman did. prior to thurman - porter there was no argument for thurman being the higher ranked welterweight.
unless you want to rate pacquiao as a welterweigth there's really no argument for anybody other than thurman or brook being considered the best at the division.
in short, i question your boxing knowledge in addition to your reading comprehension
.
Last edited by New England; 10-13-2016, 10:25 AM.Comment
-
I do know Thurman, the guy that Garcia is scheduled to fight the first quarter of next year. Garcia already worked over his divisions version of Golovkin (Matthysse) and is moving on to bigger and better things.I can only see where the fighters are ranked now. There is no way I know to go back to when Garcia fought him to see where Guererro was ranked then. I do remember him being ranked well down in the 20s. He had his ass soundly kicked by Thurman not that long before he fought Garcia. You remember Thurman, that champion Garcia is afraid to fight. Middleweight is as strong as any other weight class. It's the GGG haters who say it's so weak to try to discredit his middleweight wins. If Garcia was a middleweight he would duck GGG the same way he ducks Thurman now.Comment
-
As it should be for a reality check to those that still maintain that he seeks out the best opposition, and to magnify his lack of credibility.There must be some kind of NSB rule where when you post a thread about GGG you have to bring up in the thread somewhere that Golovkin's team said 4 years ago they would fight anybody from 154-168.
Even if the guy consistently makes efforts to try to unify 160.
It's literally in every single thread like this.
LOL.Comment
-
Boxing doesn't work IP n hypotheticals Brook didn't prove anything by getting a split nod over the only decent opponent that he faced in his entire career.i called him one of the biggest. you skipped three letters
.
lol at you being hardly capable of reading.
brook beat porter more convincingly than thurman did. prior to thurman - porter there was no argument for thurman being the higher ranked welterweight.
unless you want to rate pacquiao as a welterweigth there's really no argument for anybody other than thurman or brook being considered the best at the division.
in short, i question your boxing knowledge in addition to your reading comprehension
.Comment
Comment