Edwin Valero vs Adrien Broner at 140 pounds

[Combat Talk Radio]

valero would have beaten pacquiao and floyd.


that's how sure i was of him....


it took a murder suicide for floyd to save his 0 from valero.....


Valero vs Pacquiao would have been better than h agler vs hearns.

You're legit out of your mind. And I say this as a Valero fan.

Valero had literally NO speed and no defense. He was Arturo Gatti with less finesse.

The only one he MIGHT have stood a chance against, was Pacquiao pre-2009, when his defense was blatantly worse than post. Even then I think it would have went the way of Pacquiao/Margacheato.

Floyd? Broner? He wouldn't have even touched either one. Especially Floyd. It would have been like watching a human punching bag literally.

[SterlingStained]

You're legit out of your mind. And I say this as a Valero fan.

Valero had literally NO speed and no defense. He was Arturo Gatti with less finesse.

The only one he MIGHT have stood a chance against, was Pacquiao pre-2009, when his defense was blatantly worse than post. Even then I think it would have went the way of Pacquiao/Margacheato.

Floyd? Broner? He wouldn't have even touched either one. Especially Floyd. It would have been like watching a human punching bag literally.

you just called valero arturo gatti with less finesse lmfaaooooo YOU ARE THE ONE, that is out of your mind.

my mind is splendiferous,

my mind is pure.

YOUR MIND IS FL 0M 0 INFESTED....

valero was already hammering morales before morales hammered pacquiao.

lmfaaooooo stop trying to prop up floyd by trying to demean a boxer who was chosen by a poster to mollywhoop floyd.

i know your act around here you floids infested FL 0M 0sexual.

GTFO.....

[The Comic DON]

demarco was not his best win


moving up 2 divisions and beating Malignaggi for a title at 147 was a better win


not many fighters have won titles at 135 and 147 while skipping 140 altogether

he may not be a top welterweight but he showed he could hang with them and had a good chin and recovery power

Nah bro his best win was Demarco, Paulie never cracked Top 5 in any division he campaigned in.

And even if he was I don't need to see Valero vs Paulie know Valero would have beaten him to a bloody pulp and much more impressively than Broner, who arguably lost.

And who cares if he jumped divisions, he was fighting a career 140 fighter and he himself was cutting tons of weight fighting vastly small fighters.'

Valero would smash Broner 1 on 1, his style is all wrong for the one-dimensional Broner.

[therealpugilist]

You're legit out of your mind. And I say this as a Valero fan.

Valero had literally NO speed and no defense. He was Arturo Gatti with less finesse.

The only one he MIGHT have stood a chance against, was Pacquiao pre-2009, when his defense was blatantly worse than post. Even then I think it would have went the way of Pacquiao/Margacheato.

Floyd? Broner? He wouldn't have even touched either one. Especially Floyd. It would have been like watching a human punching bag literally.

guys like him, post for reactions and make picks based off emotion.....Valero was a talented, guy with power, holes in defense, and a lot of hype....the typical hypejob casuals get behind on this site

[The Comic DON]

You're legit out of your mind. And I say this as a Valero fan.

Valero had literally NO speed and no defense. He was Arturo Gatti with less finesse.

The only one he MIGHT have stood a chance against, was Pacquiao pre-2009, when his defense was blatantly worse than post. Even then I think it would have went the way of Pacquiao/Margacheato.

Floyd? Broner? He wouldn't have even touched either one. Especially Floyd. It would have been like watching a human punching bag literally.

But why the fuq you lying friend??

Hard to believe anything you say when your very first sentence is a bold face lie.

[therealpugilist]

Nah bro his best win was Demarco, Paulie never cracked Top 5 in any division he campaigned in.

And even if he was I don't need to see Valero vs Paulie know Valero would have beaten him to a bloody pulp and much more impressively than Broner, who arguably lost.

And who cares if he jumped divisions, he was fighting a career 140 fighter and he himself was cutting tons of weight fighting vastly small fighters.'

Valero would smash Broner 1 on 1, his style is all wrong for the one-dimensional Broner.

based off what knocking out cab drivers, and guys selling burritoes on the highway

typical overhyped NSB puncher

dude had no head movement or defense and beat a load of nobodies

[The Comic DON]

based off what knocking out cab drivers, and guys selling burritoes on the highway

typical overhyped NSB puncher

dude had no head movement or defense and beat a load of nobodies

But that's basically Broner's resume too, he just beat more of them lol.

Be honest friend you never saw Valero vs Demarco. You say is was a close fight but in reality, Valero beat Demarco pillar to post. There was nothing close or competitive about it.

[therealpugilist]

But that's basically Broner's resume too, he just beat more of them lol.

Be honest friend you never saw Valero vs Demarco. You say is was a close fight but in reality, Valero beat Demarco pillar to post. There was nothing close or competitive about it.

i saw the fight live...was excited about valero ..it was the post pbf, castillo, freitas, casamayor era, they were getting old

he had a lot of hype until his death

i like valero but he was very overrated.

No one overrates broner because they dislike his personality

emotions aside....broner is simply more talented and proven so why would i pick valero? his defense sucks


he was as powerful @ 140 and below, had better defense, better counters, solid chin....valero loses in my book.

[The Comic DON]

i saw the fight live...was excited about valero ..it was the post pbf, castillo, freitas, casamayor era, they were getting old

he had a lot of hype until his death

i like valero but he was very overrated.

No one overrates broner because they dislike his personality

emotions aside....broner is simply more talented and proven so why would i pick valero? his defense sucks


he was as powerful @ 140 and below, had better defense, better counters, solid chin....valero loses in my book.

I think you're overrating Broner.

1. Who had the better win at 130?

2. Who beat Demarco first (both Valero's and Broner's best win at 135) Broner or Valero?

3. Who received the gift decision against a career Jr. Featherweight PDL?

4. Who received a gift decision against 7-0-1 club fighter?

5. Who arguably lost to Paulie?

Sorry friend but your boy Broner is a proving fraud with a weak resume. At least Valero has an excuse but your boy Broner still fighting bums to this day. Wasn't his last fight Ashley Theopane, how pathetic.

[therealpugilist]

I think you're overrating Broner.

1. Who had the better win at 130?

2. Who beat Demarco first (both Valero's and Broner's best win at 135) Broner or Valero?

3. Who received the gift decision against a career Jr. Featherweight PDL?

4. Who received a gift decision against 7-0-1 club fighter?

5. Who arguably lost to Paulie?

Sorry friend but your boy Broner is a proving fraud with a weak resume. At least Valero has an excuse but your boy Broner still fighting bums to this day. Wasn't his last fight Ashley Theopane, how pathetic.

bro....having followed both fighters closely.....I pick broner...its not that deep..imo he is simply more talented and would deal with valero easier than the other way around