Comments Thread For: Golovkin-Jacobs: WBA Denies Request To Modify Purse Bid Split

[BattlingNelson]

the penny should have dropped at #7

Hardly surprising that you cannot see which side that has ensured that fight hasnt been signed yet. In your world 2+2 = 5.

Bonusinfo just for you: 2 + 2 = 4.

You are dismissed.

[DJ_Quaaludes]

Dude, I think you're a pretty informed poster but the triple g stuff is overbearing. Rather than let fanboys influence how you think about him what do you really think about him? Cause I think you go overboard to balance the overhype

This 100%. While I do think a few of the GGG-fans here go overboard with their views and come across biased, coming across with your own brand of bias isn't going to to do anything other than make you look silly.

GGGs resume is weak, however if you think a washed up Sergio Mora would be the best opponent on it that is clearly delusional.

[Derranged]

I don't think a paper-route strictly counts

fine, so...... Team Bull**** are unwilling to split more fairly, like they did with Hearn/Brook..... fine ^^

so..... Danny Jacobs will walk, his career will progress, and he will make other big fights.....

..... and lil'G, he will just walk

ok, you win ^^

LMAO

Not a paper route.

Second, I have no problem with Jacobs getting 40% and I personally think a deal will be reached.

Third, Jacobs will be the one who hurts if this fight doesn't happen.

[Mammoth]

so..... Danny Jacobs will walk, his career will progress, and he will make other big fights.....

Lol lol lol lol

[aboutfkntime]

Dude, I think you're a pretty informed poster but the triple g stuff is overbearing. Rather than let fanboys influence how you think about him what do you really think about him? Cause I think you go overboard to balance the overhype

I think you could be right.

[aboutfkntime]

Hardly surprising that you cannot see which side that has ensured that fight hasnt been signed yet. In your world 2+2 = 5.

Bonusinfo just for you: 2 + 2 = 4.

You are dismissed.

Team Golovkin COULD be more reasonable, like when they wanted to fight Kell Brook..... but in this case, they decided not to.

So, I don't get your point AT ALL !!

[BlakBread904]

Team Golovkin COULD be more reasonable, like when they wanted to fight Kell Brook..... but in this case, they decided not to.

So, I don't get your point AT ALL !!

umm...the Kell brook deal is no way similar to the Jacobs deal. cant even start comparing them.

K2 wasn't responsible for Brook's purse, hearn was...hearn ran that promotion, and negotiated the deal w/ eubank in mind...then offered up to brook once eubank was a no/go...c'mon man u used to be a quality poster

[aboutfkntime]

Dude, I think you're a pretty informed poster but the triple g stuff is overbearing. Rather than let fanboys influence how you think about him what do you really think about him? Cause I think you go overboard to balance the overhype

feel free to assist with that, anytime you like ^^

that way, maybe I won't feel so compelled

haven't you contributed to that " over-hype " on occasion?

what do you think about the following statement.....

FACT: Team Golovkin could be doing more to make this fight.....

true, or false..... ?

because, the same applies to every single one of those 7 guys I mentioned earlier..... and dude, that is a fact.....

Team Golovkin did not have to make all of those silly excuses to avoid Ward, Mora, Lara..... the fact is, they COULD have taken those fights, but they CHOSE not to..... the (sometimes absurd) excuses, were completely unnecessary.

And if there is any truth whatsoever to the story that Gennady can make 154, then he COULD have negotiated on the weight with Cotto..... but again, for some strange reason, they CHOSE not to.

The same with Canelo, they simply could have taken the 10mil, and fought him..... just like Canelo did when he got offered 5mil to fight Mayweather.

And they could have offered Saunders/Jacobs more..... but, again..... they CHOSE not to.

FACT: ALL of those guys are better than anyone on Golovkin's resume...... so, to somehow (for some god-forsaken UNKNOWN reason) give Golovkin a pass for his underwhelming resume'..... is utter ******ity.

I expect to be conversing with adults, and I expect adults to hold a grown man 100% responsible - therefore accountable - for his words/actions/decisions.

[Scipio2009]

Jacobs did have an issue with fighting Golovkin: He wanted more money. 1.5 million was fine, its not Golovkin's fault that Haymon was overpaying him. Let's just hope they could reach some sort of deal......

Golovkin and his camp seem willing to walk away from the Alvarez fight because they want more than $10m for the fight, so there's that.

Hopefully a deal does get done; whether it's now or after the bids, the public is finally going to get a glimpse into how serious k@ was about getting an actual competitive fight for Golovkin.

[aboutfkntime]

umm...the Kell brook deal is no way similar to the Jacobs deal. cant even start comparing them.

K2 wasn't responsible for Brook's purse, hearn was...hearn ran that promotion, and negotiated the deal w/ eubank in mind...then offered up to brook once eubank was a no/go...c'mon man u used to be a quality poster

stoppit willya LMAO

Team Golovkin were willing to split the pot more fairly with Hearn..... and the reason why Team Golovkin were willing to split the pot more fairly with Hearn, is because Kell Brook was their FIRST CHOICE..... they actually wanted that fight.

They don't give a **** about the Jacobs fight, they are more than happy to fight another no-hoper for an easy 2mil.

They are making the fights they REALLY want, and they are passing on the rest..... just like everyone else.

Smarten up.