Would Golovkin get credit for beating Badou Jack?

[youbeight]

and what a lot of you seem to be forgetting, the guy jack went life and death with (bute), GGG knocked out in amateurs with a headguard on lol

so groves beating gutknecht makes him better than GGG since he handed GGG an L in the AMs?got it bro

[Madison Boxing]

so groves beating gutknecht makes him better than GGG since he handed GGG an L in the AMs?got it bro

no but ko'ing someone in amateurs is different to outpointing them by landing some tippy tappy punches

[youbeight]

no but ko'ing someone in amateurs is different to outpointing them by landing some tippy tappy punches

W is a W, groves about to be better than GGG

[SilverMiles]

i got a feeling that both the lemiuex and munroe wins are going to look a lot better in time. See both of them having good futures.

If they could get some fights than probably so. But guys like Canelo, Quillin, Jacobs, and Saunders are holding the division up.

I just find it funny the stubbornness of the Golovkin haters. Most of them just can't say Lemiuex was a good win but Jack would be a better one. But instead they call Lemiuex a bum and Jack a proven warrior.

Even though he was flatten by Derek Edwards lol.

But I just like exposing the hypocrisy of some posters who hold early career setbacks against one fighter but make an exception for another.

[Larry the boss]

destroyed rosado and beat hassan ndam

thats a pretty sad resume man..seriously who hasnt beat Rosado?

[Larry the boss]

no but ko'ing someone in amateurs is different to outpointing them by landing some tippy tappy punches

you are pathetic man..Amatuer wins mean nothing in the pro's but you try to use them to big up GGG's lacking resume..but in this exact post you dont want anyone else to be able to do it

[youbeight]

If they could get some fights than probably so. But guys like Canelo, Quillin, Jacobs, and Saunders are holding the division up.

I just find it funny the stubbornness of the Golovkin haters. Most of them just can't say Lemiuex was a good win but Jack would be a better one. But instead they call Lemiuex a bum and Jack a proven warrior.

Even though he was flatten by Derek Edwards lol.

But I just like exposing the hypocrisy of some posters who hold early career setbacks against one fighter but make an exception for another.

lemieux is a good win. jack has actually beaten guys he wasnt suppose to beat in world title fights, which makes him more proven.

[kiaba360]

I think Jack's resume is more consistent, but Lemieux still has time to accomplish more. GBP has to match him against top 20 MWs consistently, not guys like Tapia. I wouldn't mind Lemieux vs. Monroe/Stevens. He just needs to fight more often and keep honing his skills. His power makes him a dangerous foe for just about anyone. Jack and Lemieux are both B-level in their respective divisions imo. If Jack beats DeGale, then he becomes A-level.

[SilverMiles]

lemieux is a good win. jack has actually beaten guys he wasnt suppose to beat in world title fights, which makes him more proven.

He was the underdog only because he got KTFO. But Anthiny Dirrell himself wasn't very proven.

I think a fight between Lemiuex and Jack would be competitive.

[youbeight]

He was the underdog only because he got KTFO. But Anthiny Dirrell himself wasn't very proven.

and you think lemieux is lmao ?