Comments Thread For: Hearn: Klitschko-Dependant, Joshua Fight Date Could Change

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BIGPOPPAPUMP
    Franchise Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Sep 2003
    • 46539
    • 2,259
    • 334
    • 5,493,285

    #1

    Comments Thread For: Hearn: Klitschko-Dependant, Joshua Fight Date Could Change


    [Click Here To Read More]
  • JASON SHAW
    Banned
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Jun 2016
    • 3858
    • 113
    • 0
    • 4,813

    #2
    This lying **** and joshua wont fight parker, klinchko or wilder any time soon!

    Comment

    • Uncle Rodge
      Rigotard
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Dec 2010
      • 2042
      • 259
      • 467
      • 12,316

      #3
      Originally posted by JASON SHAW
      This lying **** and joshua wont fight parker, klinchko or wilder any time soon!
      Advice - don't take boxing advice from your mum - she's full of runny shite

      Comment

      • Redd Foxx
        Hittin' the heavy bag.
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Dec 2011
        • 22007
        • 1,180
        • 2,316
        • 1,257,197

        #4
        He still doesn't sound serious or committed to this. When you're half of the negotiation team and you follow-up every statement with "but anything could happen", it's very telling.
        I think he just wants the appearance that Joshua would fight Wlad, but isn't going to risk putting Anthony in with anyone dangerous right now.

        Comment

        • Hov
          Contender
          Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
          • Apr 2016
          • 257
          • 27
          • 2
          • 11,766

          #5
          Originally posted by Redd Foxx
          He still doesn't sound serious or committed to this. When you're half of the negotiation team and you follow-up every statement with "but anything could happen", it's very telling.
          I think he just wants the appearance that Joshua would fight Wlad, but isn't going to risk putting Anthony in with anyone dangerous right now.
          I disagree. He has to fight the top fighters in the division. If he doesn't fight Wlad, he'll have to fight Parker, Pulev, or Haye.

          Comment

          • Redd Foxx
            Hittin' the heavy bag.
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Dec 2011
            • 22007
            • 1,180
            • 2,316
            • 1,257,197

            #6
            Originally posted by Hov
            I disagree. He has to fight the top fighters in the division. If he doesn't fight Wlad, he'll have to fight Parker, Pulev, or Haye.
            Trying to figure how where you're disagreeing, unless you think Pulev, Haye, and Parker are threats. I think Joshua handles any of them.
            Wlad looked awful in his last fight but he's still only a couple fights removed from being the Wlad who ****d Pulev. Hearn knows this.

            Comment

            • champion4ever
              Undisputed Champion
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Sep 2007
              • 23918
              • 4,090
              • 7,167
              • 202,915,785

              #7
              If both sides are truly serious about this, then don't just talk about it. Make the fight happen before 2017.

              Comment

              • BoxHec
                Banned
                • Sep 2016
                • 524
                • 29
                • 49
                • 10,596

                #8
                Originally posted by Redd Foxx
                He still doesn't sound serious or committed to this. When you're half of the negotiation team and you follow-up every statement with "but anything could happen", it's very telling.
                I think he just wants the appearance that Joshua would fight Wlad, but isn't going to risk putting Anthony in with anyone dangerous right now.
                You're right, when a promoter say "I still think there's a good chance it could happen, but anything could happen"; that means it's not going to happen

                Comment

                Working...
                TOP