Comments Thread For: Keith Thurman: I Want To Eliminate Danny Garcia, Vargas, Brook!

[yngwie]

Beats garcia
loses to vargas
maybe loses to brook. 50/50

Thurman doesn't losses to Vargas.

[yngwie]

I like Thurman, but he won't be fighting any good fighter anytime soon.

[Teetotaler]

Thurman doesn't losses to Vargas.

imo i think he does. Vargas is highly underrated. I like thurman but his ducking of spence is pretty telling.

[John Locke]

Beats garcia
loses to vargas
maybe loses to brook. 50/50

Vargas is the easiest fight out of the 3, he would get taken out. Brook would KO him as well, Danny would either clearly UD him or also KO him. Vargas is decent, but that's it.

[John Locke]

imo i think he does. Vargas is highly underrated. I like thurman but his ducking of spence is pretty telling.

When was the last time a champion fought a prospect? Spence is a contender now, but before the Algieri and Bundu fights, he was a prospect. So why would Thurman or any other champion fight a prospect, what's there to gain from it?

[Teetotaler]

Vargas is the easiest fight out of the 3, he would get taken out. Brook would KO him as well, Danny would either clearly UD him or also KO him. Vargas is decent, but that's it.

Takin out? Yeah just like thurman took out that 40 yo journeyman in bundu? Danny clearly UD? when was the last time danny clearly UD'd or ko anyone? I mean besides salka lol
Shoulda just kept quite kid

[John Locke]

Takin out? Yeah just like thurman took out that 40 yo journeyman in bundu? Danny clearly UD? when was the last time danny clearly UD'd or ko anyone? I mean besides salka lol
Shoulda just kept quite kid

You think an Olympian with 0 defeats in over 30 fights is a journeyman? Alright...

Bundu is a lot better than Vargas defensively, he's very hard to hit and awkward. But because Thurman didn't KO him, it obviously means he'll never KO anyone again. Gotcha.

Danny clearly beat Pauli and Guerrero. Herrera and Peterson were both very tough fights, but those guys are better than Vargas anyway.

Your agenda is very obvious

[Boxfan83]

imo i think he does. Vargas is highly underrated. I like thurman but his ducking of spence is pretty telling.

Yeah Vargas is considered the weakest champ by default because hes Mexican and not with Al Haymon.

Anyway Thurman only fights guys coming off long lay offs.

[Teetotaler]

You think an Olympian with 0 defeats in over 30 fights is a journeyman? Alright...

Bundu is a lot better than Vargas defensively, he's very hard to hit and awkward. But because Thurman didn't KO him, it obviously means he'll never KO anyone again. Gotcha.

Danny clearly beat Pauli and Guerrero. Herrera and Peterson were both very tough fights, but those guys are better than Vargas anyway.

Your agenda is very obvious

Yeah that part is true. IF he was the boxer. He was the aggressor. He had to cut off the ring against thurman. In case you didnt know its hard for boxers to cut off the ring because they are used to people chasing them. But you might be right cause when was thurman's last ko?
hahaha paulie? bumass guerrero who lost to a taxi driver?
My agenda? yeah ok dumbass

[Teetotaler]

Yeah Vargas is considered the weakest champ by default because hes Mexican and not with Al Haymon.

Anyway Thurman only fights guys coming off long lay offs.

Seriously. Vargas has the best jab out of all of them and great stamina.
Did you see that John locks response? He said danny is better because he beat ****ing malignaggi and bum guerrero who has no significant win at 147 other than past prime no ped berto and lost to a taxi driver in his last fight