PBF is Smart ! And he is the ONLY one who deserves DLH

[abdiel2k3]

Those opinions are well stated, and are backed with an argument that makes sense and goes along with actual logic, rather than rabid fanboy speculation. Taking into account public intrest, resume's etc, what he said makes sense.

make sense or not
its still opinion
it can be disproved by other **** that will also make sense

[El Jesus]

and you know **** about Mexico boxing, study up before you talk ****, miguel canto, ricardo lopez, martin castillo,salvador sanchez and a few others, **** even the great puncher ruben olivers could box if he chose too, and this goes for chavez too who also avoided punchs too but you never noticed this.

....Who is talking **** about mexican boxing? I pointed out the style of fighting that is bred there. Everytime i say something minor or negative about Latino boxing, you throw a fit, which tells me that your basically gonna ignore any logic in my point, and turn it around into a unessecary history lesson on who did what at what point in time. If i didint know what i was talking about, it would be a bit more obvious to other users other than yourself.

None of those guys you mentioned are slick fighters, none of those guys are similar to Whitaker/Mayweather Jr, which is what i mean by punching and getting out of the way.

I am not down talking mexican boxing.

[ferocity]

If whitaker stood in there and tried to trade with chavez that would have been ******, not to mention, it wouldnt have been whitakers style. the point is, Chavez lost the ****in fight, period, no way in hell that fight should have been what it was. They gave Chavez that benefit because it was Chavez, thats it.

Which regardless, proved the point that most mexican trained fighters struggle against guys who can be slick and move out of the way.

we always hear that low blows drain a fighters condition and so on....what is chavez the exception? just cause many, many people wanted to see chavez lose it doesn't take away the fact that whititler used a dirty tactic to defeat chavez!

[El Jesus]

make sense or not
its still opinion
it can be disproved by other **** that will also make sense

I agree, however, it would be a tough act to follow breaking up those opinions.

[ferocity]

....Who is talking **** about mexican boxing? I pointed out the style of fighting that is bred there. Everytime i say something minor or negative about Latino boxing, you throw a fit, which tells me that your basically gonna ignore any logic in my point, and turn it around into a unessecary history lesson on who did what at what point in time. If i didint know what i was talking about, it would be a bit more obvious to other users other than yourself.

None of those guys you mentioned are slick fighters, none of those guys are similar to Whitaker/Mayweather Jr, which is what i mean by punching and getting out of the way.

I am not down talking mexican boxing.

you weren't talking about latino boxing what ever the **** that is, you were talking about Mexican boxing, learn up on miguel canto

[El Jesus]

we always hear that low blows drain a fighters condition and so on....what is chavez the exception? just cause many, many people wanted to see chavez lose it doesn't take away the fact that whititler used a dirty tactic to defeat chavez!

Chavez was not above doing those same things, intentional headbutts, low blows, rabbit punching. Ive seen enough of Chavez in my years to know. Its been about 6 years, but i guess im gonna have to look at the fight again to remember exactly how it panned out, but i know for a fact its not the exaggeration your making it out to be when it comes to low blows. If it was, he would have been DQ'd, especially against Chavez.

Regardless, Chavez wasnt a *****.

[El Jesus]

you weren't talking about latino boxing what ever the **** that is, you were talking about Mexican boxing, learn up on miguel canto

I know i was talking about mexican boxing, and your lying if you sit there and say that the generalization i made wasnt fairly accurate no matter how you look at it. If it wasnt, why is it that you can count on one hand the amount of slick mexican (from mexico) boxers in the last 15 years? A few exceptions doesnt move the status quo.

[ferocity]

I know i was talking about mexican boxing, and your lying if you sit there and say that the generalization i made wasnt fairly accurate no matter how you look at it. If it wasnt, why is it that you can count on one hand the amount of slick mexican (from mexico) boxers in the last 15 years? A few exceptions doesnt move the status quo.

maybe so, but their are more boxers coming from mexico in the style of ricardo lopez, miguel canto, slick boxers, mexico will probably always breed the brawler fighter, the inside, body puncher but their is more slick boxers now then their probably was then.

[ferocity]

Chavez was not above doing those same things, intentional headbutts, low blows, rabbit punching. Ive seen enough of Chavez in my years to know. Its been about 6 years, but i guess im gonna have to look at the fight again to remember exactly how it panned out, but i know for a fact its not the exaggeration your making it out to be when it comes to low blows. If it was, he would have been DQ'd, especially against Chavez.

Regardless, Chavez wasnt a *****.

when and if, you decide to watch chavez v. whitiker again, from the begining count the low blows delivered by whitiker to chavez

[everlast99]

you just owned yourself, and yes, whitiker did land a lot of low blows and never did he rock chavez, **** in the 12 round he was back pedaling and holding chavez, what kind of **** was that!?

your ***in dumb dawg he did NOT land a lot of low blows and he DID rock the **** outta chavez, back pedaling yes holding no whitaker is a boxer whats he supposed to do try to fight out of his gameplan your mad cuz whitaker ***in schooled chavez .....i owned myself wut the *** is this middle school?