Do you prefer the slick/technical boxer or the aggressive/offensive fighter?

[Hov]

It seems like most boxing fans prefer the aggressive fighter that will exchange and ****. Which do you prefer?

[LoadedWraps]

It seems like most boxing fans prefer the aggressive fighter that will exchange and ****. Which do you prefer?

The problem with this question is that you can be a slick/technical fighter and an offensive fighter at the same time.

That's my preference, all three. But I always lean towards technical, as a boxer myself, but it's a common misconception that you can't be defensive and offensive at the same, as well as technical and offensive at the same time.

[Earl-Hickey]

I prefer the slick/****** style

[Willy Wanker]

I prefer the slick/****** style

[Shpacman]

Technical aggresive boxer

[Willy Wanker]

I generally prefer offensive aggressive fighters being the violent savage that I am.

But I appreciate fighters with a slick/defensive technical style, preferably the ones with a good work rate. I mean watching prime Whitaker work was a thing of beauty. And Lomachenko is one of my favorite fighters today and I enjoyed watching Crawford take Postol to school.

That's why I love Duran, he could do it all.

[KLockard23]

I love someone who is a hybrid of both. Felix Trinidad, Roy Jones Jr., etc. Those type of cats.

[Bushbaby]

I love someone who is a hybrid of both. Felix Trinidad, Roy Jones Jr., etc. Those type of cats.

I don't think Tito was really defensive at all tbh.

[mlac]

I dont like it when they punch each other i prefer no one getting hit i only watch boxing to learn.

[have_not]

When they do both, like Lomachenko, pirog.
Must be the most skillfull style