Comments Thread For: Hearn: Joshua-Klitschko Should Have Tyson Fury's Titles at Stake

[TexasCowBoy]

Wlad is The Man At Heavyweight ...Klitschko broke tyson fury mentally....Klitschko drove fury over the edge.....hell tyson made cokehead excuses all this time ..... Fury should sing Eric Claptons song "******* " or Lynard Skynards song "That Smell "....Klitschko drove tyson to doing drugs ...Tyson needed to escape the reality of the rematch .....Well done Wlad.

[deathofaclown]

I like the fight but i don't see why all the titles should be on the line.

Strip Fury by all means, but I don't see what Joshua has done to just skip over the mandatory number 1 contenders in the WBA and WBO. And it's not like it's a unification which takes priority, because Wlad isn't even a champion as it stands.

If anyone is to fight for the vacant titles, then it should be the number 1 and 2 contenders in each division, it's only right. If Wlad v AJ doesn't happen, it could mean we get Wlad v Ortiz for the WBA as they're the number 1 and 2 contenders.

I do like the fight, but i'd be pretty annoyed if i was Parker or Ortiz who are ranked as number 1 contenders by WBA and WBO and they get skipped over.

[R_Walken]

Hearns just content to have Joshua steal all of Tysons belts and not actually earn them

It's a joke that some of the people on this site are co-signing this f.uckery

[vitali1999]

He can have all but the WBC title. Wilder will never fight Joshua. It'll be like Kovalev and chickenson. Kovalev can have all but one title

[REMOVE SHARK 55]

His UKAD trial for nandrolone is tbc...
VADA PED test is yet to be released but will come out before then.

Im not a fury fan, and i definitely wouldnt be suprised if he failed his sept 22nd test for peds but as much as i think the guy is a complete tit and i think should be stripped purely because of the disrepute he brings to the division, i do think think we should wait until at least the VADA ped results before claiming he sought an unfair advantage even if he is a sherbeted up ***** mess...

disclaimer : by the way.. im tyson furied off my **** after cleverley won me 400 quid writing this, so expect my opinion to change within 12 hours.


( took me 6 minutes to write this... ****k you spellcheck )

lol well done on your bet, I had a little one myself. I want to see the report from VADA, this is surreal to me.

[KillaCamNZ]

You can paraphrase this whole thing with:

"Eddie Hearn gets hard over thinking of how much more $ this fight would draw".

Before thinking about what extra straps should be on the line - worry about actually putting together a decent fight for your cash cow.

[Clubber Pac]

Well that would depend on if he failed his test in March prior to schooling Wladimir.
If not then probably should be champion in recess and Wladimir fights for the IBF strap only.

Do you understand the business of boxing, once he tested positive for coke, the possibility of being a champion in recess went out of the door. Tyson Fury is done, he is going to have to fight his way into a mandatory position, by that time, he will be close to 30, if not older. In that time, nobody in their right mind would ake an optional defense against him, not after all this BS. He blew his chance at greatness,

[REMOVE SHARK 55]

Do you understand the business of boxing, once he tested positive for coke, the possibility of being a champion in recess went out of the door. Tyson Fury is done, he is going to have to fight his way into a mandatory position, by that time, he will be close to 30, if not older. In that time, nobody in their right mind would ake an optional defense against him, not after all this BS. He blew his chance at greatness,

He blew his chance at greatness? Some of you NSB members like to re-write history. 25th November 2015 IS greatness dummy!.

Do you work for UKAD or are you a QC dealing with Tysons case for the Supreme Court?

[Clubber Pac]

He blew his chance at greatness? Some of you NSB members like to re-write history. 25th November 2015 IS greatness dummy!.

Do you work for UKAD or are you a QC dealing with Tysons case for the Supreme Court?

Look man, make an argument, because you just failed to do that. Nothing in your post refutes a single point I just made. We don't even know if he was clean that night. Nobody was more excited than me when he won the titles, but it was Tyson who destroyed his legacy. Yes, he blew his chance to be great.

[REMOVE SHARK 55]

Look man, make an argument, because you just failed to do that. Nothing in your post refutes a single point I just made. We don't even know if he was clean that night. Nobody was more excited than me when he won the titles, but it was Tyson who destroyed his legacy. Yes, he blew his chance to be great.

The second part of my post deals with your waffle. If you don't work for either organisations your points are invalid.