Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Hearn: Joshua-Klitschko Should Have Tyson Fury's Titles at Stake

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Comments Thread For: Hearn: Joshua-Klitschko Should Have Tyson Fury's Titles at Stake

    Eddie Hearn, promoter of IBF heavyweight champion Anthony Joshua, wants Tyson Fury's titles to be on the line if a deal can be agreed for a fight with former beltholder Wladimir Klitschko.

    [Click Here To Read More]

  • #2
    Well that would depend on if he failed his test in March prior to schooling Wladimir.
    If not then probably should be champion in recess and Wladimir fights for the IBF strap only.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by StudentOfDaGame View Post
      Well that would depend on if he failed his test in March prior to schooling Wladimir.
      If not then probably should be champion in recess and Wladimir fights for the IBF strap only.
      What?

      He tested positive for PEDs
      He tested positive for *******
      He refused a drug test
      He has been inactive for a year


      so many reasons to strip him

      Comment


      • #4
        Looks like Hearn is already saying the fight won't be taking place. Wlad will probably have a chance to win back either the WBA or WBO, but not both. WBA will probably order #2 Klitschko vs. #1 Ortiz for the vacant Super belt and the WBO will order #2 Klitschko vs. #1 Parker for their vacant belt. If Wlad goes the WBA route, then Parker-Ruiz will probably be for the vacant WBO. If Wlad goes the WBO route, which I think he will, the WBA will order Ortiz vs. Ustinov (again) with the winner to face the winner of Browne-Oquendo. I see Parker going for the Joshua fight anyway, so if Wlad targets the WBO, he'll probably face Ruiz or even Jarrell Miller for the vacant belt.

        Hearn probably wants a couple more fights for Joshua before putting him in with Klitschko.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by E-Sharp View Post
          Looks like Hearn is already saying the fight won't be taking place. Wlad will probably have a chance to win back either the WBA or WBO, but not both. WBA will probably order #2 Klitschko vs. #1 Ortiz for the vacant Super belt and the WBO will order #2 Klitschko vs. #1 Parker for their vacant belt. If Wlad goes the WBA route, then Parker-Ruiz will probably be for the vacant WBO. If Wlad goes the WBO route, which I think he will, the WBA will order Ortiz vs. Ustinov (again) with the winner to face the winner of Browne-Oquendo.

          Hearn probably wants a couple more fights for Joshua before putting him in with Klitschko.
          1st and 2nd in wba and wbo should fight for this Belts if tyson got stript ,not Wlad and AJ,just why? wrong reply E-Sharp not to you.

          Comment


          • #6
            now we're starting to see the mess Tyson fury has left behind....I'm not a big fan of Joshua going after all the belts like this ...one maybe say the WBA but the others should be made vacant and then the two highest ranked fighter and contest it.....even though I have no time for fury I kind of feel sorry for him....he had everything in the palm of his hands and he's just thrown it all down the toilet like its dirty toilet paper....I can't fathom him really and really his team are just at fault as what he is....team fury see him every day and they must have known how undisciplined and burning the party candles and to get him to sign for the october 29th fight is unforgivable.
            The fury management should have withdrawn him and sent him to rehabilitation and away from the boxing scene.....as I said I don't like fury but were all rounding on him like a pack of wolves now and it's not a good thing to do....he's f@cked up and he has to pay the penalty now...boxing has to move on
            Last edited by The plunger man; 10-01-2016, 06:50 PM.

            Comment


            • #7
              They should not just be fighting for both titles that

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Hov View Post
                What?

                He tested positive for PEDs
                He tested positive for *******
                He refused a drug test
                He has been inactive for a year


                so many reasons to strip him
                He tested positive for ******* on the 22nd September. His PED test in March is to be decided upon by the Supreme Court and UKAD. Not by NSB members and tabloids.

                Comment


                • #9
                  I hope this fight happens, I and I hope Joshua is like a 4-1 underdog so that I can make some money.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by StudentOfDaGame View Post
                    He tested positive for ******* on the 22nd September. His PED test in March is to be decided upon by the Supreme Court and UKAD. Not by NSB members and tabloids.

                    His UKAD trial for nandrolone is tbc...
                    VADA PED test is yet to be released but will come out before then.

                    Im not a fury fan, and i definitely wouldnt be suprised if he failed his sept 22nd test for peds but as much as i think the guy is a complete tit and i think should be stripped purely because of the disrepute he brings to the division, i do think think we should wait until at least the VADA ped results before claiming he sought an unfair advantage even if he is a sherbeted up ***** mess...

                    disclaimer : by the way.. im tyson furied off my **** after cleverley won me 400 quid writing this, so expect my opinion to change within 12 hours.


                    ( took me 6 minutes to write this... ****k you spellcheck )

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP