should aggression be rewarded more than it currently is

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Larry the boss
    EDUCATED
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Jan 2011
    • 90798
    • 6,419
    • 4,473
    • 2,500,480

    #41
    so you want fighters to get credit for being aggressive while missing most of their punches???? wow..

    Comment

    • Larry the boss
      EDUCATED
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Jan 2011
      • 90798
      • 6,419
      • 4,473
      • 2,500,480

      #42
      If you are to damn dumb to adapt in a fight you deserve to lose

      Comment

      • Larry the boss
        EDUCATED
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Jan 2011
        • 90798
        • 6,419
        • 4,473
        • 2,500,480

        #43
        Originally posted by bigdramashow
        playing tag and run, refusing to engage, stinking out the place, holding/clinching should not be rewarded. If neither fighter is landing much of a substance (and i dont count a couple of jabs flicked out as proper shots) the aggressive fighter should get the benefit of the doubt.
        thats just ******..you want to credit a fighter for coming forward and not landing anything???lol...you are getting desperate

        Comment

        • Elroy The Great
          Banned
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Aug 2016
          • 15935
          • 371
          • 249
          • 45,972

          #44
          theres wild and reckless aggression and then theres the superior controlled effective aggression. not everyone has power so they have to make do.

          Comment

          Working...
          TOP