Maybe I should spend the next 14 years of my life posting about why I think Ray Mancini beat Livingstone Bramble. Think of the difference I could make.
Video exposed:Why Castillo Beat Mayweather (Landed Punches Count)
Collapse
-
Comment
-
Just admit it. Its OK!Comment
-
I dont get how these haters spend so much time trying to prove either floyd lost to manny or castillo. Who gives a ****? Im a floyd fan and i dont even care anymore, the fact that you guys keep making these threads is just pathetic go do something productive with your time instead. Your opinion wont change **** the record will stand 49-0 .
Seriously do you guys have nothing better to do other than talk about a guy you bitterly hate? Pathetic fools.Comment
-
First 5 rounds? Yikes! For Floyd fans, the opponent has to win big in order to win a round even though it was Castillo who was the champ. Lets face it, Floyd didn't do enough in most of the rounds of the fight to give him the win and take away the belt from the champ, Castillo.
Compubox is not perfect but the numbers were so lob sided for Castillo. The thing is that Floyd's numbers show that the majority of his punches came from his jab in which Floyd said he couldn't throw and didn't have the power that he wanted since he had an injury.
So to say, Castillo throw the more effective punches no matter how you add them up. Replays concur.
Floyd does that in many fights. Throws a "touch" jab or a "touch" punch with little to nothing on it and Floyd fans think that because he threw punches, no matter how effective they were, its enough to win the rounds and the fight.
.
Floyd won the first 5 rounds easily especially the first 4. I don't see how you had Castillo winning more than 6 rounds that fight. And yes, a touch jab counts just as much as a power shot in professional boxing unless the opponent is visibly wobbled.
I'm sure you never saw the Cotto Mosley fight because guys like you come to boxing with an agenda. But in that fight Cotto and Mosley landed the exact same amount of punches as the other and Mosley was even more active but Cotto ended winning the fight. Why? Because Cotto was more effective with his jab and controlled the ring more often than Mosley did..
You guys don't know what judges look for in a professional prize fight so you make up your own rules.Comment
-
Many people felt that Sugar Ray Leonard lost against Hagler, many people felt that Ali lost against Jones, Norton and Young, many people felt that Spinks lost to Holmes, many people felt that Pacquiao lost Marquez, many people felt that Chavez lost against Whitaker, many people felt that Dela Hoya lost against Sturm...
People are still crying over this?, i get you can make an argument that Castillo deserved the win, but that doesn't changes the fact that there it was a rematch to see who left without doubts, and guess who left without doubts?
Are you all crying because you want to see a 48-1?, i mean, that's pathetic, someone has a fighter that hates or just don't like it, but this kind of things are an obsession, the man retired a year ago and people are still doing these things?.Comment
-
Floyd critics try to make their own boxing rules just to discredit Floyd lol
Floyd won the first 5 rounds easily especially the first 4. I don't see how you had Castillo winning more than 6 rounds that fight. And yes, a touch jab counts just as much as a power shot in professional boxing unless the opponent is visibly wobbled.
I'm sure you never saw the Cotto Mosley fight because guys like you come to boxing with an agenda. But in that fight Cotto and Mosley landed the exact same amount of punches as the other and Mosley was even more active but Cotto ended winning the fight. Why? Because Cotto was more effective with his jab and controlled the ring more often than Mosley did..
You guys don't know what judges look for in a professional prize fight so you make up your own rules.
Secondly, if you think that Floyd won so EASILY the first 5 rounds then how come Lederman gave 2 of 5 to Castillo? So I pretty much shot down your points right there.
Unless we are discussing apples with apples NO, a "touch" jab is NOT the same as an effective power punch. To compare it as the same, it would be a "touch" power punch .... but an effective power punch can easily negate several "touch" jabs.
Mosley vs Cotto. Of course I saw it. It was a close fight where Mosley had the chance to win it in the final rounds but let Cotto off the hook. Mosley was spent by then. Cotto looked vulnerable in those final rounds.Comment
-
I guess you think that of Lederman too because he thinks that you are wrong.
Secondly, if you think that Floyd won so EASILY the first 5 rounds then how come Lederman gave 2 of 5 to Castillo? So I pretty much shot down your points right there.
Unless we are discussing apples with apples NO, a "touch" jab is NOT the same as an effective power punch. To compare it as the same, it would be a "touch" power punch .... but an effective power punch can easily negate several "touch" jabs.
Mosley vs Cotto. Of course I saw it. It was a close fight where Mosley had the chance to win it in the final rounds but let Cotto off the hook. Mosley was spent by then. Cotto looked vulnerable in those final rounds.
And it's hilarious how you site Lederman for the Castillo fight but not the Pacquiao fight.Comment
Comment