The 'Danny Garcia has a great resume' Myth.

[mlac]

Name 5 active fighters who clearly have a better resume.....i'll wait......

Pacman
Bradley
Canelo
cotto
ward

[therealpugilist]

Pacman
Bradley
Canelo
cotto
ward

No ****.....Of course you throw in 2 future hall of famers...lets be real.....their arent many fighters who have a better resume than he does and those that do are all 30 years old and up and already accomplished hall of fame credentials

the only guy you listed in his 20s is Canelo the rest are long time pros and near hall of famers

so obviously he has one of the better resumes in the sport whether you like him or not

[mlac]

No ****.....Of course you throw in 2 future hall of famers...lets be real.....their arent many fighters who have a better resume than he does and those that do are all 30 years old and up and already accomplished hall of fame credentials

the only guy you listed in his 20s is Canelo the rest are long time pros and near hall of famers

so obviously he has one of the better resumes in the sport whether you like him or not

What is the point of you posts ?

not insulting, just curious. You can't dispute anything i write in the original post, so you try and move the goalposts, i answer easily and now you move the goalposts again.

[al-Xander]

Boxing is subjective, let's face it.

The same clowns who denigrate Khan and Matthysse are now saying they are great wins for Garcia. Khan and Matthysse, two biggest hype jobs in boxing, according to Garcia fans. Now they're saying the exact opposite.

[Adonis Creed]

Not as overrated as Canelo's.

[The Gambler1981]

It is pretty good he has 2 very good wins and some other decent ones. His career is still going and he is still relatively young at 28 so he can still make his career pretty special.

I don't think he gets there because he will get beat when he fights any really good 147 pounder in my opinion and he might never take a risk like that again who knows. However, judging a fighter career midstream is generally a useless exercise and judging a guy at the worst possible point is misleading at best.

[therealpugilist]

What is the point of you posts ?

not insulting, just curious. You can't dispute anything i write in the original post, so you try and move the goalposts, i answer easily and now you move the goalposts again.

......the point is you crap on a lot of fighters when you dismiss Garcia's resume...he has one of the better ones in the sport so whats your point

[M Bison]

Danny doesn't want to step it up him and his big mouthed father their is no way that they'd avoid making a decent fight for him Danny Garcia Vs. Thurman, Porter etc they'd be easy to make If Garcia was serious about it.

[Outwest Exp 355]

You're nitpicking a bit, yea it ended quickly, but he was still being outboxed and outclassed - it doesnt really matter though you are correct as a KO is a KO.

As for 'clearly' beating lucas, that's a slight exaggeration, he won the fight, but he didnt win by more than 2-3 round's.

Let's not forget he lowblowed lucas well over a dozen times, it really was ridiculous, bordering on Salido-lomachenko style.

If there was a fair reff, you might be seeing a draw with point deductions, but that's all hypothetical now so...I did say it's the best win of his career, so credit where it's due...

Khan won one round the 1st. Danny was already walking Khan down by the 2nd. And the rest, well you know how it ended. I could easily say the 2nd was an even round.

[boliodogs]

He has a good resume but his last fight with a real good fighter was Matthysse and then he hired Haymon and turned into a cherry picking champion. He hasn't fought a dangerous guy or a top 6 rated guy since then. His resume has not improved a bit since he fought Matthysee so long ago. To me his resume is worse now for years of nothing but cherry picked fights.