Comments Thread For: Parker Tabbed By Bookies as Big Underdog in Joshua Fight

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • NateHound
    Contender
    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
    • Jan 2016
    • 264
    • 21
    • 28
    • 6,471

    #31
    Originally posted by juggernaut666
    You will see Breazeale is very good,you guys are judging him on Joshua and so called fights he was losing ,when he was countering just fine and ****ing Mansour around mid way thru ,his power added up and hurt him bad,it was only a matter of time before his size and power was going to win that fight. what you like most fail to realize is challengers fight the champions harder,put that Breazeakle who fought Joshua against Mansour and he wins everytime. The knockdown was also an off balance one,it had little to do with Breazeales chin...Joshua is the only one to legitamatly knock him down with straight power.
    As for the Whyte comment that's fair enough to be honest it's so early in both careers there is a long way to go and I wish them both the best as Whyte is a great personality and Parker seems made out of pure respect for the sport.

    On Breazeale man I think you are just plain wrong. And no, I don't base it off the Joshua fight. I work part time in a boxing/MMA gym in Melbourne, I live and breathe the sport. Vs Kassi, Vs Vargas and Vs Mansour he looked utterly horrible. Yeah he has a chin and we will see that give him a decent career but offensively he has a lot of work because he does not do enough to trouble the top 10.

    Now just above me you have insulted someone for having the opinion that Parker is better than Breazeale. Cmon mate, drop that attitude. Make a poll I guarantee you're in the minority on that one. No need to be a **** to people like above. Saying people don't know boxing because of having that opinion is mental. Some of us know just as much.

    Comment

    • juggernaut666
      Banned
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Mar 2015
      • 15544
      • 1,226
      • 500
      • 87,472

      #32
      Originally posted by NateHound
      As for the Whyte comment that's fair enough to be honest it's so early in both careers there is a long way to go and I wish them both the best as Whyte is a great personality and Parker seems made out of pure respect for the sport.

      On Breazeale man I think you are just plain wrong. And no, I don't base it off the Joshua fight. I work part time in a boxing/MMA gym in Melbourne, I live and breathe the sport. Vs Kassi, Vs Vargas and Vs Mansour he looked utterly horrible. Yeah he has a chin and we will see that give him a decent career but offensively he has a lot of work because he does not do enough to trouble the top 10.

      Now just above me you have insulted someone for having the opinion that Parker is better than Breazeale. Cmon mate, drop that attitude. Make a poll I guarantee you're in the minority on that one. No need to be a **** to people like above. Saying people don't know boxing because of having that opinion is mental. Some of us know just as much.
      you will see in the end I will be correct and you are not really looking at the fights,boxing is also about progression not stagnation,you cannot point to fight A and then not look at fight D.



      No,i didn't insult someone,i insulted a leech and he knows why!

      Comment

      • juggernaut666
        Banned
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Mar 2015
        • 15544
        • 1,226
        • 500
        • 87,472

        #33
        Originally posted by mlac
        You are eddie hearn's wet dream, 02 arena is basically full of idiot's paying money to watch a robot fight fat failed NFL players and then proclaiming him to be the best heavyweight on the planet. THEN claim the Fat failed NFL players are better than one of the best prospects in the division ( WHO HAS A BETTER WIN THAN AJ)

        you are truly ridiculous
        Breazeale is more polished and came up in the Olympic rankings against legit talent,you cannot see this b/c you are a Parker fanboy,one of many annoying ones to add,in a way I kind of look forward to Joshua dispatching of him for ones like you...

        you simply don't know really the ins and outs of what makes a good fighter ,and as stated about half your posts are ignorant and laughable at the same time!

        Comment

        • mlac
          Undisputed Champion
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Feb 2014
          • 20361
          • 1,635
          • 1,491
          • 210,093

          #34
          Originally posted by juggernaut666
          Breazeale is more polished and came up in the Olympic rankings against legit talent,you cannot see this b/c you are a Parker fanboy,one of many annoying ones to add,in a way I kind of look forward to Joshua dispatching of him for ones like you...

          you simply don't know really the ins and outs of what makes a good fighter ,and as stated about half your posts are ignorant and laughable at the same time!
          oh my goodness what a fool i am, from seeing breazeale fight, what i thought i saw was a fat unskilled bum, that was not good enough for the NFL and is not good enough to be in anyone's top 25 heavyweight list in the world.

          But NOW you've convinced me with your argument!!

          'he was in the olympics doe'

          Comment

          • NateHound
            Contender
            Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
            • Jan 2016
            • 264
            • 21
            • 28
            • 6,471

            #35
            Breazeale barely made the olympic qualifiers and got demolished first round.

            Comment

            • creekrat77
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Feb 2013
              • 4136
              • 376
              • 198
              • 233,075

              #36
              Originally posted by deathofaclown
              Good odds for a bet on Parker.

              Personally i don't think he will win but 7/1 for the guy who actually has wins over better opposition than the favourite are pretty good odds.
              Damn! 7/1?? If there was a fight to bet on this year, It'd be this one. Parker seems pretty legit. He's got power and style is reminiscent of Joe Louis

              Comment

              • juggernaut666
                Banned
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Mar 2015
                • 15544
                • 1,226
                • 500
                • 87,472

                #37
                Originally posted by NateHound
                Breazeale barely made the olympic qualifiers and got demolished first round.
                The video game character in your avatar didnt even make it to the olympics , how did his skills look? If you cant see what what good basics look like well...... so tell me who fights and resembles more of an amateur the upright easy to hit Parker (and hes the fastest HW ) or the decent form , solid base Breazeale who would be more than good enough to win a New Zealand championship where Parker came up in his amateur background?
                Last edited by juggernaut666; 09-30-2016, 05:06 AM.

                Comment

                • juggernaut666
                  Banned
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Mar 2015
                  • 15544
                  • 1,226
                  • 500
                  • 87,472

                  #38
                  Originally posted by mlac
                  oh my goodness what a fool i am, from seeing breazeale fight, what i thought i saw was a fat unskilled bum, that was not good enough for the NFL and is not good enough to be in anyone's top 25 heavyweight list in the world.

                  But NOW you've convinced me with your argument!!

                  'he was in the olympics doe'

                  "oh my goodness what a fool i am, " Yes we can certainly agree on this for sure !

                  Comment

                  • NateHound
                    Contender
                    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                    • Jan 2016
                    • 264
                    • 21
                    • 28
                    • 6,471

                    #39
                    Originally posted by juggernaut666
                    The video game character in your avatar didnt even make it to the olympics , how did his skills look? If you cant see what what good basics look like well...... so tell me who fights and resembles more of an amateur the upright easy to hit Parker or the decent form , solid base Breazeale ?
                    Tyson proved his talent by looking sharp as hell against decent competition up until prison. Breazeale looks like he ****ing learnt to box in a prison yard. Your opinion is your opinion, most of us on here who know as much if not more tend to think he's ****. Not hard to understand...

                    Parker easy to hit but Breazeale isn't? HAHA. Jesus man. Breazeale gets hit by everyone with utter ease. He's what, 6'7? He shouldn't be getting touched for god sakes. Take his **** out of your mouth. He's nowhere near it.

                    Neither of them fight like amateurs to be honest. Amateurs tap and move. Parker is all about using the jab to set up combos (until he lapses like he tends to do because he does not have a world class coach,) and Breazeale is all over the place. The dude literally stumbles forward because of terrible balance.

                    Comment

                    • juggernaut666
                      Banned
                      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                      • Mar 2015
                      • 15544
                      • 1,226
                      • 500
                      • 87,472

                      #40
                      Originally posted by NateHound
                      Tyson proved his talent by looking sharp as hell against decent competition up until prison. Breazeale looks like he ****ing learnt to box in a prison yard. Your opinion is your opinion, most of us on here who know as much if not more tend to think he's ****. Not hard to understand...

                      Parker easy to hit but Breazeale isn't? HAHA. Jesus man. Breazeale gets hit by everyone with utter ease. He's what, 6'7? He shouldn't be getting touched for god sakes. Take his **** out of your mouth. He's nowhere near it.

                      Neither of them fight like amateurs to be honest. Amateurs tap and move. Parker is all about using the jab to set up combos (until he lapses like he tends to do because he does not have a world class coach,) and Breazeale is all over the place. The dude literally stumbles forward because of terrible balance.
                      The problem is Parker DOES fight like an amateur and shouldn't the FASTEST guy not be so Easily hit? Maybe bc you really think his basic stance he uses isnt amateurish? He throws jabs though ? Breazeale gets hit because he isnt fast ,he fights in spurts and hasn't learned to fully adjust his long arms in defense though looked much better in the Joshua fight of course boxing scene logic is he looked awful and is a bum , he fought the pit bull of the division and lost but got the best version of him "What was i thinking?


                      My original post stands your a fool and now you can add idiot to it too....
                      Last edited by juggernaut666; 09-30-2016, 05:34 AM.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP