Comments Thread For: Hearn Says Parker is Frontrunner For Anthony Joshua, Nov. 26

[-Freddy-]

I'm excited if it happens.

via *****

Mike Dyson

[Madison Boxing]

Was never In doubt that he'd pick Parker. How about you fight someone who can fght back for once Joshua, don't care about parkers record he is dog****

[RememberTUA?]

humiliation with what GUNS & ROSES.....Joshua is still unbeaten and about to face some top heavyweights in the next year....denium is nowhere to be found now since the fury scandal and his hero fury has been found doping and seems reluctant to ever fight again... tell me what humiliation axel rose because im here h and denium has gone reggie perrin on us

Lol meet for a private wager?.... Keyboard warrior alert!! Seriously some people...

[RememberTUA?]

Was never In doubt that he'd pick Parker. How about you fight someone who can fght back for once Joshua, don't care about parkers record he is dog****

Parker still has the power and speed to beat roboshua if he applies it right, parker is probably 3 times faster than brezeale was, and much faster than dillan whyte too, parker has a good chance, not to say aj don't.

[BodiesInFlight]

Was never In doubt that he'd pick Parker. How about you fight someone who can fght back for once Joshua, don't care about parkers record he is dog****

If not Parker then who would you be happy with?

Let me guess. Ortiz?

[Madison Boxing]

If not Parker then who would you be happy with?

Let me guess. Ortiz?

Rather the other two, pulev or stiverne. I commented at the time saying he'd pick Parker without a doubt and he has. It will be sold to fans as the two best unbeaten prospects fighting, when Parker is actually useless and has no chance. Why can't he fight a solid proven fighter for once? And why couldn't he fight ortiz or am I being unfair expecting the world heavyweight champion to fight the top challengers? Guess that type of thinking Is out of fashion these days

[BodiesInFlight]

Rather the other two, pulev or stiverne. I commented at the time saying he'd pick Parker without a doubt and he has. It will be sold to fans as the two best unbeaten prospects fighting, when Parker is actually useless and has no chance. Why can't he fight a solid proven fighter for once? And why couldn't he fight ortiz or am I being unfair expecting the world heavyweight champion to fight the top challengers? Guess that type of thinking Is out of fashion these days

Wasn't Stiverne dropped by Rossy in his last fight? How is he better than Parker at this point who is coming off a pretty impressive win over Takam. I see nothing wrong with this fight at all. In fact i'm excited for it being the casual i am.
I'd have been happy with Pulev but i'm not going to be all "OMG he ducked Pulev for Parker! we're being robbed of a super fight!"

Ortiz needs to raise his profile. He's ancient and no casual knows of him. I can understand why he wasn't considered atm.

[Madison Boxing]

Wasn't Stiverne dropped by Rossy in his last fight? How is he better than Parker at this point who is coming off a pretty impressive win over Takam. I see nothing wrong with this fight at all. In fact i'm excited for it being the casual i am.
I'd have been happy with Pulev but i'm not going to be all "OMG he ducked Pulev for Parker! we're being robbed of a super fight!"

Ortiz needs to raise his profile. He's ancient and no casual knows of him. I can understand why he wasn't considered atm.

How does he raise his profile if no one will fight him. None of the public know Parker either, won't have seen him.fight that's for sure. Fair enough if you are looking forward to it, don't want to sound like Mr negative but I'm not hyped about it one bit, got early ko written all over it and we still won't know how good Joshua is or isn't.

[mlac]

Rather the other two, pulev or stiverne. I commented at the time saying he'd pick Parker without a doubt and he has. It will be sold to fans as the two best unbeaten prospects fighting, when Parker is actually useless and has no chance. Why can't he fight a solid proven fighter for once? And why couldn't he fight ortiz or am I being unfair expecting the world heavyweight champion to fight the top challengers? Guess that type of thinking Is out of fashion these days

useless? he has a better win than either joshua or wilder.

Parker would easily beat both stirverne and pulev. stirverne is shot and a c level plodder, pulev has a jab and nothing else.

ydsab.

[KillaCamNZ]

when Parker is actually useless and has no chance. Why can't he fight a solid proven fighter for once? And why couldn't he fight ortiz or am I being unfair expecting the world heavyweight champion to fight the top challengers?

For someone who's been around boxing for more than 5 minutes, you're an idiot.

Parker got the mando by beating someone above anyone Joshua has beaten. If Parker isn't proven to be at least solid, you must think Joshua is a bum killer.

Secondly, fight the top challengers? Joshua is the IBF holder. Parker is the #1 IBF challenger. Therefore, Parker is the top challenger for that belt. That doesn't need much more explanation. Or does it?