Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Julio Cesar Chavez Jr. Eyes Tentative Return Date of December 3

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Comments Thread For: Julio Cesar Chavez Jr. Eyes Tentative Return Date of December 3

    Former WBC middleweight champion Julio Cesar Chavez Jr. is still focused on returning to the ring by the end of 2016 and says there is a tentative return date in place of December 3 in the United States.

    [Click Here To Read More]

  • #2
    Chavez Jr. vs. Porky Medina! Make it happen!

    Comment


    • #3
      PBC is back lol.

      Comment


      • #4
        Fight Gilberto Rameriz!

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by MasterPlan View Post
          PBC is back lol.
          When GGG vs. Lemieux, Crawford vs. Postol, and Canelo vs. Smith have all flopped, should we still be trying to clown PBC? Vargas vs. Salido = 883K. Thurman vs. Porter = 2.4 million! Spence vs. Bundu = 6 million! I'm just sayin'!

          Comment


          • #6
            Put him in with anyone good at 168 and it should be a good fight. Fonfara was too big for him with good fundamentals. Chavez couldn't make it a war with him like he usually does because he was just too big. We saw what Rogelio Medina did to James Degale... put Chavez Jr. in there with Degale and it could be like that but with more power, a better fight. Gilberto Ramirez would kick Chavez Jr's ass though. Too long, too powerful, too fast. He's like Fonfara but more talented and more powerful. Degale is a good fight for Chavez though. Maybe Badou Jack.

            How about Chavez Jr. vs Bernard Hopkins for Hopkins farewell fight at 168 and for the sake of name recognition and posterity? Hopkins would probably still school him as Chavez is pretty slow and awkward but on the other hand Chavez jr throws bombs and big left hooks a lot harder than BHop throws them. It would be an interesting style clash and have good name value, be marketable.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Bronx2245 View Post
              When GGG vs. Lemieux, Crawford vs. Postol, and Canelo vs. Smith have all flopped, should we still be trying to clown PBC? Vargas vs. Salido = 883K. Thurman vs. Porter = 2.4 million! Spence vs. Bundu = 6 million! I'm just sayin'!
              Yes, we should. PBC sucks, is a disgrace to boxing, and may very well just have been a ponzi scheme the whole time for Al to make money while ruining the sport. Thurman-Porter's 2.4 million was on network TV so that rating sucks. Spence vs Bundo was right after the Olympics and is therefore a meaningless outlier. If ratings were normally good like you imply, PBC wouldn't have lost 500 million dollars already. Clearly, the ratings aren't as good as you think

              Also, as boxing fans, the most important thing is the quality of the fights, and Spence-Bundo was a complete joke of a mismatch, which any matchmaker should have known after Keith Thurman won every single round against Bundu the year before. 41 year olds who already lost every round in their one recent fight at the top level should not be getting another fight against the most talented young welterweight in the world. That's just common sense for any good matchmaker but if PBC has proven one thing, it's that they don't have good matchmakers.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Bronx2245 View Post
                When GGG vs. Lemieux, Crawford vs. Postol, and Canelo vs. Smith have all flopped, should we still be trying to clown PBC? Vargas vs. Salido = 883K. Thurman vs. Porter = 2.4 million! Spence vs. Bundu = 6 million! I'm just sayin'!
                I was joking thats good news.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Bronx2245 View Post
                  When GGG vs. Lemieux, Crawford vs. Postol, and Canelo vs. Smith have all flopped, should we still be trying to clown PBC? Vargas vs. Salido = 883K. Thurman vs. Porter = 2.4 million! Spence vs. Bundu = 6 million! I'm just sayin'!
                  Dude you can't compare pbc numbers to GGG or Canelo on HBO. It's at least an extra $15 a mont on your cable bill compared to free.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Bronx2245 View Post
                    When GGG vs. Lemieux, Crawford vs. Postol, and Canelo vs. Smith have all flopped, should we still be trying to clown PBC? Vargas vs. Salido = 883K. Thurman vs. Porter = 2.4 million! Spence vs. Bundu = 6 million! I'm just sayin'!
                    How much ppv does Spence bundu sells?

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP