Has there ever been a fighter considered top 3 p4p with a thin resume like GGG

[therealpugilist]

He's not just p4p top 3, he's number 1 over here, was top by a mile in sky sports vote. Damn that must sting. Sorry mate but people enjoy watching him fight, they don't enjoy watching the boring twats that you fawn over. Not only does he win, he entertains, which is something you hate

"exciting" does not = great

I like being entertained. Its not entertaining watching sacrificial lambs fight a "monster.....i.e. brook who only faced one world ranked ww in his career and no one worth a damn over 147

the kos would mean a lot more if they were actually against top fighters from 154-168


sorry...thank you, come again

[Madison Boxing]

"exciting" does not = great

I like being entertained. Its not entertaining watching sacrificial lambs fight a "monster.....i.e. brook who only faced one world ranked ww in his career and no one worth a damn over 147

the kos would mean a lot more if they were actually against top fighters from 154-168


sorry...thank you, come again

The fighters you like.are a who's who of most boring fighters. Brook is a damn good fighter and it was a damn good scrap. You hate ggg cause he's proven you can be exciting and win at the same time, a lot of you can't handle that coupled with the fact he isn't American and casual fans are in awe of him.

[BillyBoxing]

Terrance Crawford isn't considered top 3 p4p

He actually has a better resume than GGG considering He unified the wbc, wbo and ring titles at 140......he also held the wbo and ring title at 135

he won all his titles in the ring.

Wins over lundy, and Jean are comparable the murray and macklin consider considering who the fighters beat and their success

Defeating Ricky Burns is on Par with Geale and Burns went on to win a title at 140

His win over Gamboa and Brook are comparable. Both were highly regarded fighters from lower weights, and we undefeated

TC win over Postol gives him the edge. Postol was undefeated, finding his stride, and a stylistic nightmare for most at 140.


Difference between GGG and TC is Crawford has a better resume but doesn't get near the hype, others like Chocolatito, Danny Garcia, KOVALEV do as well

Postol has only been in one world championship fight, he was a quite unexperienced fighter, that's a quite overrated win but still a very impressive performance from TC.

Agreed with your analysis, but still not a enough complete IMO.
I think GGG has a better record than Crawford because he faced more ranked fighters in 17 title defenses, GGG also has wins over guys like Lemieux, Stevens, Ouma...

And like I said, being a world championship amateur and sylver medalist in the olympics puts DEFINITELY GGG over Crawford as a boxer.

That's just IMHO.

GGG is hyped, maybe because of his character.

Ward and Kova might be more boring guys.

Hell, you're a big actor of this hype machine since you and your cats come in every GGG threads leaving dozen of comments.

There are like 5 GGG threads each dayz on BS and thread alsmost always hit 300 comments.

[BillyBoxing]

No. I know my boxing because the Brit judge had Brook ahead and the other TWO judges had the fight EVEN, Einstein.

Any person who thinks Brook lead the fight need to hang himself up.

Brook literally took a beatdown.

[BillyBoxing]

Like I said, YDKSAB. Your obvious contradiction above proves as much...

Where is the contradiction you freakin idiot?

You pretend power and intangible like chin aren't P4P criteria?

Answer instead of ducking like your heroe, yes or not?

[BillyBoxing]

40 year old Holmes and LHW Spinks are *lightyears* ahead of anyone on Bumlovkin's resume.


It's paifully obvious that YDKSAB..


Calzaghe is head and shoulders above Bumlovkin. No question...

Don't duck the points.

I never compared Tyson, Calzaghe to GGG's record.

Both ended their career.

I just asked if Tyson's wins and Calzaghe over "ATGs" are true ATG wins, I don't think so.

Jones was shoter than sht, Holmes way past his prime, old and coming out of retirement.

Hopkins was in his forty, Spinks was a lightheavy.

[BillyBoxing]

It's still a LOSS.


It's still a LOSS.


He's never been ranked in the top 3.


There is *nothing* particularly impressive about knocking over a TOMATO CAN...

It's still a robbery.

Murray is not a can but a ranked contender for years at the very least.

Can't wait to see the demografic disappear from this forum in few years when your last heroes got send into retirement.

[therealpugilist]

Postol has only been in one world championship fight, he was a quite unexperienced fighter, that's a quite overrated win but still a very impressive performance from TC.

Agreed with your analysis, but still not a enough complete IMO.
I think GGG has a better record than Crawford because he faced more ranked fighters in 17 title defenses, GGG also has wins over guys like Lemieux, Stevens, Ouma...

And like I said, being a world championship amateur and sylver medalist in the olympics puts DEFINITELY GGG over Crawford as a boxer.

That's just IMHO.

GGG is hyped, maybe because of his character.

Ward and Kova might be more boring guys.

Hell, you're a big actor of this hype machine since you and your cats come in every GGG threads leaving dozen of comments.

There are like 5 GGG threads each dayz on BS and thread alsmost always hit 300 comments.

those 17 title defenses are a joke...throughout his "reign" other fighters held the super title or the regular one

also he never won the super title in the ring

[BillyBoxing]

those 17 title defenses are a joke...throughout his "reign" other fighters held the super title or the regular one

also he never won the super title in the ring

Because fighters vacated...

Then the top contenders face each others and then emerge a new champion.

Is that so new for you?

Regarding regular, superchampion titles, put the blame on greedy federation, not the G.

[therealpugilist]

Because fighters vacated...

Then the top contenders face each others and then emerge a new champion.

Is that so new for you?

Regarding regular, superchampion titles, put the blame on greedy federation, not the G.

either way, he was never the single titleholder so the defenses literally mean nothing

when Hopkins held the ibf he won the title in the ring, and was the only titleholder for the org

stop making up fake records to pump this guy up...he isnt exactly knocking out world beaters