Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Has there ever been a fighter considered top 3 p4p with a thin resume like GGG

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by boliodogs View Post
    You are the one wearing the tampon. The bet is on the table right now but you are too big of chicken**** to back up your own words. The answer to your question is his resume is great and he deserves the high pound for pound rating that intelligent fans and experts give him.He has made 17 successful defenses of his world titles all by KO wins. No other champion fighting today has done that. No other champion today even owns three belts. No other champion defends his titles nearly as often as he does. He already fought and KOed a top 5 middleweight in Lemieux, you ****** ****. Many of the other guys he fought were top 10 world rated and many other top guys refused to fight him even though he tried like hell to get fights with them. You hate the guy all right. You start 2 or 3 hate threads about him daily and as long as you keep doing that I'm going to keep cussing you. I won't bother to ask you for a bet any more because you obviously won't back up your opinion even with points. When GGG's next fight against Jacobs or Saunders is announced I'll just come back and remind you that you said he wouldn't fight them.

    bwahahahahahahahahahahahaha

    Comment


    • Originally posted by therealpugilist View Post
      bro...those defenses are a joke....didn't sturm and geale have the super title when he was just the regular champion



      stop trying to pump up this man's resume with fake records.....Hopkins has 20 for most of a major title, and monzon has the most with 14 for the lineal title


      facts
      they will bring up that hes fought all those top 10 contenders but sht on Jacob win over #5 rated quillen!!!!!!

      Comment


      • Originally posted by 12TRIBEsRiSe View Post
        they will bring up that hes fought all those top 10 contenders but sht on Jacob win over #5 rated quillen!!!!!!
        Quillen was top 3...

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Nay_Sayer View Post
          Quillan is better than *anyone* on Bumlovkin's resume..
          I know you're a troll who only shows up to **** talk Golovkin for whatever reason, but serious question to everyone who actually believes this nonsense: When the **** did Quillin ever show in the ring that he was better than anyone Golovkin has fought?

          Quillin's best win is N'Dam, who Lemieux also beat. Quillin fought even with Rosado, who is one of Golovkin's worst opponents in the past 4 years. He beat ancient Winky Wright. And...that's it. He ducked Golovkin shamelessly and was ultimately obliterated in a round by Jacobs.

          What about that is better than Geale, Macklin, Murray, or Lemieux? I swear, people have this ridiculous idea of what they think Quillin should have been, and assume he was actually that good. In the ring, Quillin was never that good.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by therealpugilist View Post
            fight a top 5 fighter from 154-168


            he hasn't since Lemieux some had him around 6-7


            its pretty simple. How many top 3 or 5 fighters has he defeated? not many if any
            You don't think Lem, Macklin, Geale and Murray were top 5 middleweights when GGG fought them? Macklin I guess could be considered outside the top 5 at the time but top 10 isn't bad. Some people even had Stevens highly rated when they fought.

            Who else was he supposed to fight? Again Canelos name pops up but we all know what's going on there. Some people called for a Martinez fight around 2011-12 but that was unlikely due to the great Maravilla reaching the end of his career. Cotto plainly said he didn't even consider himself a middleweight.

            The rest is history.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by soul_survivor View Post
              You don't think Lem, Macklin, Geale and Murray were top 5 middleweights when GGG fought them? Macklin I guess could be considered outside the top 5 at the time but top 10 isn't bad. Some people even had Stevens highly rated when they fought.

              Who else was he supposed to fight? Again Canelos name pops up but we all know what's going on there. Some people called for a Martinez fight around 2011-12 but that was unlikely due to the great Maravilla reaching the end of his career. Cotto plainly said he didn't even consider himself a middleweight.

              The rest is history.
              who did macklin and murray beat to even be considered top 5? neither guy ever defeated a top ten middleweight bro...get real

              Comment


              • So Tyson's two wins against ATGs are a 39 year old Holmes who had lost his previous two fights and a blown up LHW in Michael Spinks? Sorry, I'm not buying that argument.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by Nay_Sayer View Post
                  Bumlovkin has *never* beaten a top 3 MW. NEVER...
                  Who do you consider a top 3 middleweight from his first HBO fight 2011/12, cant remember which year, till now?

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by therealpugilist View Post
                    who did macklin and murray beat to even be considered top 5? neither guy ever defeated a top ten middleweight bro...get real
                    Oh ffs, don't be ****** now. Macklin, Murray, at one time Barker and Geale were all top 10 if not top 5 middleweights at one time or other. If you even have to argue that then you don't watch boxing.

                    Comment


                    • The vast majority of Bernard Hopkins' successful middleweight defenses were against guys below the level of the GGG opponents you guys are ****ting on.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP