Which Was A Better Fight For Boxing? Smith or Brook?

[Mr.MojoRisin']

0% chance of that happening.

Better than Golovkin vs Brook. There is absolutely nothing good about a mismatch like that.

[BoxingFan85]

The outcome for both the fights were known and the betting odds were also favoring the winner. Smith vs Canelo was better because it was not a bigger mismatch than GGG vs Brook..

[Ce1ska]

Brook was beaten because of the size difference. Smith was beaten because he was out of his league.

Canelo probably had 10 pounds on him that night; it was a essentially a JMW vs a MW.

[Jsmooth9876]

Brooks a better fighter that's for sure... Smith was basic as fk...earmuffs and occasional punches thrown...not hard to beat that...

[Clegg]

Better than Golovkin vs Brook. There is absolutely nothing good about a mismatch like that.

Sure, I'm a Brook fan but knew he was too small. I'm just saying, if you think Alvarez will face the other champs at 154, there's no chance. High risk, low reward.

[Zaroku]

I'm pinching a loaf fit for pact@rds, as I sit on the can, contemplating boxing, among other things. C

Smith in my opinion.

[pacmanis1]

One was a mismatch because of size, the other a mismatch of skill. No real right answer. I'd lean more towards Smith being better but at the same time mismatches should never be on PPV.