Originally posted by Scott. Weiland
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Good News!! Jacobs before Saunders
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Eastcoast View PostToo bad team Jacobs is already looking for a way out of the fight.Last edited by ThatDude44; 09-16-2016, 04:43 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ThatDude44 View PostI've BEEN wanted him to try 168 since the Ward back and forth but not for.him to go fight.Chavez Jr. The fact is he's staying in the 160 division so if that's the case then I hope for.Jacobs.
Chavez would at least pose danger for the first few rounds. I'm of the opinion GGG beats DeGale, Zurdo and Jack though may run into problems versus Smith.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by ThatDude44 View PostI dont see where he's avoiding he fight, also the article says Jacob's confidence went up after he saw Brook land on GGG. Jacobs fought Friday night before Kell-GGG. The article is a.slurp fest. I guess GGG is trying to get out of the Canelo fight by demanding 50-50.
Jacobs manager is clearly trying to price him out
Comment
-
Originally posted by HeroBando View PostWhy would you guess that? Why would he be trying to get out when his opponent won't be ready for a year at least?
Jacobs manager is clearly trying to price him out
Comment
-
In a perfect boxing world
Later this year
Ggg vs jacobs
Saunders vs Eubanks
Early next year
Ggg vs saunders
Canelo vs cotto 2
Next fall
Ggg vs Canelo
2018
Ggg vs Ward, Ramirez, jack, deGale, etc
Comment
-
Danny Jacobs would beat the breaks of off Saunders. There is a reason Saunders didn't want that noise.
Comment
-
"You mean the same Saunders that struggled with Andy Lee"
Andy lee is a great middelweight kido. It was more of a reflection of how good saunders is against power punchers. Saunders is the second best middlweight in the world, jacobs is third. TRUST ME
Comment
-
Originally posted by PACnPBFsuck View PostYeah, let's put GGG on with a "man" who tells another man, "GGG can beat us both in one night", that's the guy we want to see GGG in the ring with.
Comment
Comment