Comments Thread For: Golovkin's Promoter To Begin Immediate Negotiations For Jacobs

[NateHound]

Two scrubs? Lemeuix was getting smacked around by Marco Antonio Rubio, and Stevens was getting his arse kicked by guys from the contender. Jacobs will be the first real opponent with power that Golovkin will face.

Don't care if you think they're scrubs. If you don't think Lemeuix, Stevens and Rubio have huge power then you're just a complete ****ing daft ****.

[The Akbar One]

I don't care if they are scrubs, they have power when I bend over for them. It makes me talk them up to something they aren't on boxing forums.

Regardless of your tendencies, Lemeuix, Stevens, and Rubio aren't that good, point blank period. None of them would be top 10 guys any year in the 90s.

[The Akbar One]

If you stay within the context of the post, some casual fan said GGG hasn't fought anyone with power which I corrected with my response. Your womanlike tendency to change the subject and make it about something it initially wasn't is exactly why nsb is in the ****ter.

KOing bums is considered having power these days. That casual fan should have stated instead that GGG hasn't fought a top level opponent with power.

The subject was Golovkin's promoter beginning negotiations to fight Jacobs. Golovkin ball gobblers trying to over rated scrubs like Stevens, Rubio, and Lemeuix to prop Golovkin up is laughable.

[The Akbar One]

Good wins, nothing more. Geale is GGG's best win to date.

Good wins in the context of Golovkin reigning over the weakest middleweight division in 50 years. Good in the division, but taking a wider perspective, above average wins is more like it. Geale is horrible. Another guy that wouldn't have been a top 10 guy in the 90s. Murray was his best win in my opinion.

[Jewish-Reptile]

Good wins in the context of Golovkin reigning over the weakest middleweight division in 50 years. Good in the division, but taking a wider perspective, above average wins is more like it. Geale is horrible. Another guy that wouldn't have been a top 10 guy in the 90s. Murray was his best win in my opinion.

Geale achieved more than Murray. I don't buy into that.

[The Akbar One]

Geale achieved more than Murray. I don't buy into that.

I disagree. He got a controversial decision over Sturm, while Murray got a controversial draw. Looking at both fights, Murray seemed more deserving of the W than Geale. Murray also got screwed down in Argentina against Martinez. Geale would have been KO'd by Sergio Martinez. Golovkin wiped his arse with Geale, while Murray put up a valiant effort in getting stopped in the late rounds. Geale also lost to Mundine, and Barker for crying out loud. Murray would have never lost to guys like that at middleweight.

[Jewish-Reptile]

I disagree. He got a controversial decision over Sturm, while Murray got a controversial draw. Looking at both fights, Murray seemed more deserving of the W than Geale. Murray also got screwed down in Argentina against Martinez. Geale would have been KO'd by Sergio Martinez. Golovkin wiped his arse with Geale, while Murray put up a valiant effort in getting stopped in the late rounds. Geale also lost to Mundine, and Barker for crying out loud. Murray would have never lost to guys like that at middleweight.

Horse shyt. Geale was a wide winner over Sturm, Murray got a deserved draw.you clearly never watched that Geale Sturm fight.

Murray admitted himself he didn't work hard enough versus Martinez.

Geale took a punch from GGG he never saw, Murray may have been valiant but he was thoroughly beaten up for eleven rounds in a fight he wasnt in the least competitive, I'm not sure he landed a solitary blow, Geale hit GGG with a punch from the heavens yet failed to move him. GGG should be at 168, period ain't no one standing up to him in this division.

Geale lost to Barker in a SD, a fight he dropped Barker hard and a fight I believe he shouldn't have lost but ultimately Geale accepted he lost. Murray lost to Groves, a perennial under achiever.

[The Akbar One]

Horse shyt. Geale was a wide winner over Sturm, Murray got a deserved draw.you clearly never watched that Geale Sturm fight.

Murray admitted himself he didn't work hard enough versus Martinez.

Geale took a punch from GGG he never saw, Murray may have been valiant but he was thoroughly beaten up for eleven rounds in a fight he wasnt in the least competitive, I'm not sure he landed a solitary blow, Geale hit GGG with a punch from the heavens yet failed to move him. GGG should be at 168, period ain't no one standing up to him in this division.

Geale lost to Barker in a SD, a fight he dropped Barker hard and a fight I believe he shouldn't have lost but ultimately Geale accepted he lost. Murray lost to Groves, a perennial under achiever.

I watched the the broadcast of Sturm vs Geale, I didn't see anything wide at all. Using Sturm as the benchmark though just shows how *****ty the division is. These guys are having tough fights with a guy who was beaten easily by an old man when he was in his prime. Regardless of what Murray claimed, he did enough to win, in a fair world. They even took away one of his knockdowns to help ensure Martinez got the win. Golovkin took the trash out when he fought Geale. Cotto then took the trash out again, by packing Geale up with ease. Geale wasn't that good man. He was more a product of careful matchmaking. Recall how he was ducking Pirog back when Pirog was active.

[Jewish-Reptile]

I watched the the broadcast of Sturm vs Geale, I didn't see anything wide at all. Using Sturm as the benchmark though just shows how *****ty the division is. These guys are having tough fights with a guy who was beaten easily by an old man when he was in his prime. Regardless of what Murray claimed, he did enough to win, in a fair world. They even took away one of his knockdowns to help ensure Martinez got the win. Golovkin took the trash out when he fought Geale. Cotto then took the trash out again, by packing Geale up with ease. Geale wasn't that good man. He was more a product of careful matchmaking. Recall how he was ducking Pirog back when Pirog was active.

You're intolerable. Cotto drained Geale down to a weight he hasn't fought at in eight years at a grand age of 34 ! The only frustration I had with that fight was I believed Danny could be competitive, if you believe for one moment those three pounds didnt kill him then you've no idea of the dangers of catch weights. I've never looked at Cotto in the same light and don't in the least endorse dangerous cw's.

[The Akbar One]

You're intolerable. Cotto drained Geale down to a weight he hasn't fought at in eight years at a grand age of 34 ! The only frustration I had with that fight was I believed Danny could be competitive, if you believe for one moment those three pounds didnt kill him then you've no idea of the dangers of catch weights. I've never looked at Cotto in the same light and don't in the least endorse dangerous cw's.

Cotto held a gun to Geale's head? No. Geale sold himself out for the payday. I don't disagree with you though, and I think it was a real b!tch move by Cotto to try and drain Geale down. I lost all respect for Cotto after that bull*****.