Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Will Lil G's fans ever want him to move up and chase greatness ???

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #91
    Originally posted by hugh grant View Post
    Every DEMENTED 3g fanboy dreams about him beating hagler. Hagler HAS the better resume but us DEMENTED fanboys understand having a better resdresdume don't mean you'll beat someone head to head. we tell ourselves this all the time
    youre pretty honest for a 3g fan.

    Comment


    • #92
      Originally posted by SemiGreat View Post
      youre pretty honest for a 3g fan.
      Hey you changed my quote. I said everyone knoiws gggbeats haglker who struggled with lightweights.
      Yes Duran was great but in every division he fought he had an almost equal. Who gave him a cklose fight. Buchanan comes too mind
      Last edited by hugh grant; 09-13-2016, 04:43 AM.

      Comment


      • #93
        Originally posted by Mike D View Post
        Hey Adam is that you in that picture sporting the TMT gear?

        Goddamn man whoever that is looks like the ultimate top tier cuck. Cuck of the decade. ATG cuck.

        I bet that dude's girlfriend gets trains ran on her on the weekends while dude wearing the TMT gear watches from the crack in his blinds from outside the window of his single wide.

        Anyway as for the question -- I'm a Golovkin fan to an extent, but at the end of the day I'm first and foremost a boxing fan. It's not like I'd lose sleep if Gennady lost. So yeah, I wanna see him in the best fights possible. And yeah it's disappointing that the dude has feasted on virtually nothing but B & even C grade fighters. Brook is an A fighter but obviously him having to come up 2 divisions stains the W.
        Brook is a B+ fighter at best until proven otherwise. What has he accomplished for him to be in the upper echelon of fighters? You do know what an A level fighter is right? Pacquiao, Mayweather, Ward, Klitschko, Cotto, Marquez... These are proven A level fighters with a proven record. Having 1 decent win over Shawn Porter DOES NOT make you A level.

        Comment


        • #94
          Originally posted by fighter1234 View Post
          Brook is a B+ fighter at best until proven otherwise. What has he accomplished for him to be in the upper echelon of fighters? You do know what an A level fighter is right? Pacquiao, Mayweather, Ward, Klitschko, Cotto, Marquez... These are proven A level fighters with a proven record. Having 1 decent win over Shawn Porter DOES NOT make you A level.
          Yeah I see where you're coming from. Resume wise sure. But the eye test says to me that he's an A guy. And I'm not a Brook fan per se, or just trying to hype Golovkin's win.

          Brook is an impressive fighter though. If he's not an A guy yet by resume...he's definitely IMO an A guy as far as skill level goes.

          Comment


          • #95
            If a boxer can make weight without any issues and always on weight, I don't have any problem with him staying at that weight.

            As long as he starts to create a weight division for himself is where I start to dislike a boxer. Canelloni style.

            @ 160lbs he can still fight good fighters - Jacobs, Andy Lee, Quillin & Billy Joe, and if Canelloni grows a pair and fights him, he will be a good fight for him as well.

            Who the **** is good / with a name at super middleweight right now? Groves or Callum Smith? and why does he has to go up almost 10 kilos to fight Ward when he can make 160lbs without issues?

            Brook went up two weight classes to fight him? thats his issue, now he has a broken eye socket. He would have took Mayweather's example and stayed at his weight.

            Comment


            • #96
              Originally posted by Mike D View Post
              Yeah I see where you're coming from. Resume wise sure. But the eye test says to me that he's an A guy. And I'm not a Brook fan per se, or just trying to hype Golovkin's win.

              Brook is an impressive fighter though. If he's not an A guy yet by resume...he's definitely IMO an A guy as far as skill level goes.
              Where do you put khan at his peak was he A level. People say khan has better resume than brook, therefore greater. But brook would beat khan.
              Same for hagler. Hagler has better resume the GGG, but GGG beats hagkler

              Comment


              • #97
                Does GGG need to move up when Jacobs is on deck for his next fight? That's a damn honest fight that I'd actually be interested in watching.

                Comment


                • #98
                  Originally posted by SemiGreat View Post

                  nah, ill stick around and enjoy the exposing of your god. who knows ? maybe a smaller guy will move up and rattled 3g but good.

                  ''naw. 3g cant move up unless hes fighting 2 specific people.....its much better for him to stay put and wait for little guys to gain weight.''
                  you mean like Hopkins stayed put and waited for Tito to move up from 147 and for Oscar to move up from 130?

                  Like that, or different?

                  Comment


                  • #99
                    Originally posted by hugh grant View Post
                    Where do you put khan at his peak was he A level.
                    I do think at his peak, yes, Khan was an A level talent. Nowadays though it appears those days are behind him. He's still a blue chip talent in areas-- the hand speed is still mesmerizing, but his leaky defense and chin are just too lacking.

                    Personally I see him as a B guy. Can still dominate C guys, and win his fair share against B level dudes, but falls short against any of the true A tier fighters.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by SemiGreat View Post
                      the prerequisite ''fighting to build a name'' stage of hops career looks a lot like 3gs career. hop moved on to bigger and better things. one day 3g might do like wise.
                      And thats exactly the point, but you put Hops entire resume vs GGGs at 35. Sitcho azz down.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP