Question. Who would've finished Brook faster??
Collapse
-
Alright, once again..No you don't. Otherwise you wouldn't have made this pathetic thread based on your obviously hurt feelings. You're no better or different from the delusional "sycophants" you're complaining about.
Golovkin did what he had to do. No shame in that. But if you're expecting no criticism (for a shi t fight) when every other fighter in history has been critisized, then you better pull up your skirt and thicken your skin.
I'm not trying to say criticism shouldn't be warranted at Golovkin.
I'm saying that a lot of the most morbid criticism's are coming from one particular area. That is TBE fans seething everytime Golovkin is mentioned. Nobody wants to address it or admit it. Floyd Mayweather and his sycophants have an irrational hate towards Golovkin that is completely irrational. I completely understand someone criticising Golovkins not technically sound performance as not being anything great. I don't care at all if Golovkin wins or loses. I was actually pulling for Brook in this fight. I'm just making the point that the popular culture in American boxing which I guess you'd say is very much influenced by Floyd, hates Golovkin just as much as Americans hate FloydComment
-
Had GGG boxed him behind the jab the fight would have been over in 3-4 but he got wild. He wanted to ko him better than Canelo did khan and he failedI'm not sure, because in boxing all it takes is one punch. But Golovkin did a terrible job trying to finish Kell off when he was hurt. He abandoned the body, abandoned the game plan, and was swinging like he had one too many beers and got into a bar fight. There was nothing methodical about it.
I guess in the end, he got the job done so it doesn't really matter but he could've possibly got a first round stoppage if he had fought a little smarter. Imo.Comment


Comment