GGG/Brook was as exciting as Hagler/Hearns!

[kafkod]

And it was a similar fight in many ways. The best MW in the world vs one of the best WW's. The MW champ threw "boxing" out of the window and just went after the WW and turned it into a street fight, relying on his strength and power advantage to come out on top!

[Robbie Barrett]

Muhahahahaha this is why you're a clown.

[mlac]

It definitely had me way way more pumped than i expected.

The hairs on the back of my neck stood up at points and my heart was in my mouth, ...not many fights do that to me

[HeadShots]

except GGG didn't lose to the WW

[Robbie Barrett]

except GGG didn't lose to the WW

Hagler didn't lose to Hearns.

[Redd Foxx]

It was an exciting fight but let's not ruin everything by saying ignorant shyt like that. Threads like this make me embarrassed that I spend time discussing boxing on here.

[*TonyMontana*]

No no no no no no no no NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO IT WASNT

[Eastcoast]

I was thinking about this last night. Brook has no where near the lethal reputation Tommy Hearns had, though like Hearns stunning Hagler, Brook seemed to stun Golovkin, and of course they only woke up sleeping giants in the process.

But between Brook's lack of reputation/accomplishments and Golovkin not getting the 'I think he's dead!' KO, this fight falls many, many levels below Hagler/Hearns.

[kafkod]

except GGG didn't lose to the WW

Hagler didn't lose to Hearns. Your'e thinking of Hagler vs Sugar Ray Leonard?

[HeadShots]

Hagler didn't lose to Hearns.

is that who are talking about here? reread thread title.



hagler also lost to a Monroe level fighter which GGG did not =)